Re: mediaont-10 RDFs availabilty?

I can make the first hour of the telecon, the second is already blocked by
another meeting. But this should be no problem.

Best,

Tobias


> count me in
>
>   pa
>
> On 11/03/2010 12:43, Felix Sasaki wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> it seems that a large part of the working group is participating, which
>> is great. I agree with Veronique, a a skype meeting is good. I will be
>> on travel starting this evening until Tuesday, but Tuesday before or
>> after the regular call would work for me. Maybe we can have even one
>> intensive meeting for 2 hours to get the general architecture done
>> quickly. So how about Tuesday, 16th March, 13-15 UTC?
>>
>> Felix
>>
>> 2010/3/11 ì´ì›ì„ <wslee@etri.re.kr <mailto:wslee@etri.re.kr>>
>>
>>     Hi. All.
>>
>>     I would like to join the Task Force as well ;)
>>
>>     Best regards,
>>     Wonsuk
>>
>>     > -----Original Message-----
>>     > From: public-media-annotation-request@w3.org
>>     <mailto:public-media-annotation-request@w3.org>
>>     [mailto:public-media- <mailto:public-media->
>>     > annotation-request@w3.org <mailto:annotation-request@w3.org>] On
>>     Behalf Of Evain, Jean-Pierre
>>     > Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2010 6:45 PM
>>     > To: 'vmalaise'; Bailer, Werner
>>     > Cc: Tobias Bürger; raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr
>>     <mailto:raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr>; Soohong Daniel Park; Felix
>>     > Sasaki; public-media-annotation@w3.org
>>     <mailto:public-media-annotation@w3.org>
>>     > Subject: RE: mediaont-10 RDFs availabilty?
>>     >
>>     > Hello all,
>>     >
>>     > Count me in.
>>     >
>>     > Jean-Pierre
>>     >
>>     > -----Original Message-----
>>     > From: public-media-annotation-request@w3.org
>>     <mailto:public-media-annotation-request@w3.org>
>>     [mailto:public-media- <mailto:public-media->
>>     > annotation-request@w3.org <mailto:annotation-request@w3.org>] On
>>     Behalf Of vmalaise
>>     > Sent: jeudi, 11. mars 2010 10:29
>>     > To: Bailer, Werner
>>     > Cc: Tobias Bürger; raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr
>>     <mailto:raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr>; Soohong Daniel Park; Felix
>>     > Sasaki; public-media-annotation@w3.org
>>     <mailto:public-media-annotation@w3.org>
>>     > Subject: RE: mediaont-10 RDFs availabilty?
>>     >
>>     > Hi!
>>     >
>>     > I would also be interested in participating. Should we have a
>> skype
>>     > meeting soon to decide on the architecture? I guess the best would
>>     be to
>>     > extend the part that already exist from Werner or Chris, but we
>> should
>>     > decide for one only for time reasons, right?
>>     >
>>     > Best,
>>     > Véronique
>>     >
>>     > On Thu, 11 Mar 2010 09:30:12 +0100, "Bailer, Werner"
>>     > <werner.bailer@joanneum.at <mailto:werner.bailer@joanneum.at>>
>> wrote:
>>     > > Dear all,
>>     > >
>>     > > I also got the question before, and it is in line with what we
>>     need in
>>     > our
>>     > > implementation, so I would support such a task force.
>>     > >
>>     > > Best regards,
>>     > > Werner
>>     > >
>>     > >> -----Original Message-----
>>     > >> From: public-media-annotation-request@w3.org
>>     <mailto:public-media-annotation-request@w3.org>
>>     [mailto:public-media- <mailto:public-media->
>>     > >> annotation-request@w3.org <mailto:annotation-request@w3.org>]
>>     On Behalf Of "Tobias Bürger"
>>     > >> Sent: Donnerstag, 11. März 2010 09:23
>>     > >> To: raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr
>> <mailto:raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr>
>>     > >> Cc: Soohong Daniel Park; 'Felix Sasaki';
>>     public-media-annotation@w3.org
>> <mailto:public-media-annotation@w3.org>
>>     > >> Subject: Re: mediaont-10 RDFs availabilty?
>>     > >>
>>     > >> Hi,
>>     > >>
>>     > >> I also got this request from a couple of people before...
>>     > >>
>>     > >> I would join a task force to realize this in the course of the
>>     MAWG;
>>     > >>
>>     > >> Best,
>>     > >>
>>     > >> Tobias
>>     > >>
>>     > >> >> It's good news to the group. What's due in his schedule ?
>>     and only
>>     > >> RDF
>>     > >> >> not API ?
>>     > >> >>
>>     > >> >> And, what folks thank about this TF for RDF representation
>>     of our
>>     > >> >> ontology 1.0 ?
>>     > >> >
>>     > >> > I would be very very pleased to see this ontology represented
>> in
>>     > >> > RDFS/OWL/SKOS/RIF also as soon as possible. I got similar
>>     questions
>>     > >> > (almost daily) with people working in multimedia related web
>>     > >> companies.
>>     > >> >
>>     > >> >    Raphaël
>>     > >> >
>>     > >> > --
>>     > >> > Raphaël Troncy
>>     > >> > EURECOM, Multimedia Communications Department
>>     > >> > 2229, route des Crêtes, 06560 Sophia Antipolis, France.
>>     > >> > e-mail: raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr
>>     <mailto:raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr> & raphael.troncy@gmail.com
>>     <mailto:raphael.troncy@gmail.com>
>>     > >> > Tel: +33 (0)4 - 9300 8242
>>     > >> > Fax: +33 (0)4 - 9000 8200
>>     > >> > Web: http://www.eurecom.fr/~troncy/
>>     <http://www.eurecom.fr/%7Etroncy/>
>>     > >> >
>>     > >> >
>>     > >> >
>>     > >>
>>     > >>
>>     > >> --
>>     > >> _________________________________________________
>>     > >> Dr. Tobias Bürger
>>     > >>
>>     > >> STI Innsbruck
>>     > >> University of Innsbruck, Austria
>>     > >> http://www.sti-innsbruck.at/
>>     > >>
>>     > >> tobias.buerger@sti2.at <mailto:tobias.buerger@sti2.at>
>>     > >> __________________________________________________
>>     > >>
>>
>>
>
>
>


-- 
_________________________________________________
Dr. Tobias Bürger

STI Innsbruck
University of Innsbruck, Austria
http://www.sti-innsbruck.at/

tobias.buerger@sti2.at
__________________________________________________

Received on Thursday, 11 March 2010 16:46:23 UTC