W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-annotation@w3.org > March 2010

RE: Update API document

From: 이원석 <wslee@etri.re.kr>
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2010 11:12:42 +0900
Message-ID: <B4EAD1122C31304099A5CDEA5447210F01E167FB@email2>
To: <tmichel@w3.org>
Cc: <Chris.Poppe@UGent.be>, "Felix Sasaki" <felix.sasaki@fh-potsdam.de>, "Bailer, Werner" <werner.bailer@joanneum.at>, <public-media-annotation@w3.org>
Hi. Thierry.
I fixed bugs. Please find the enclosed file.

Best regards,
Wonsuk.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thierry MICHEL [mailto:tmichel@w3.org]
> Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2010 12:40 AM
> To: Chris.Poppe@UGent.be
> Cc: 'Felix Sasaki'; 'Bailer, Werner'; 이원석; public-media-
> annotation@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Update API document
> 
> 
> Chris,
> 
> I have copied the API document to
> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/API10/WD_V2/Overview.ht
> ml
> 
> The document does not validate HTML.
> http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotati
> ons/drafts/API10/WD_V2/Overview.html
> 
> Also there is a broken link
> 
> Line: 648 ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/bcp/bcp47.txt
> 
> 
> Please fix these two issues ASAP as I can not publish the document as is.
> 
> 
> On my side I have updated the Status of this document section and header
> section to conform to the publication rules.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Thierry.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Poppe wrote:
> > Dear all,
> >
> >
> >
> > I have updated the API document according to the remarks of Werner
> > (except for the list of possible values remark).
> >
> >
> >
> > @Felix,
> >
> > I guess the request could look something like this (I have no idea about
> > the proper syntax so it’s just to give you an idea):
> >
> > Request:
> > http://example.com/my-media-resource/getProperty?ma-name=x&?ma-
> source=y&?ma-subtype=z&?ma-language=s&?ma-fragment=t
> >
> >
> >
> > Not sure how to denote that these are optional parameters, or what the
> > JSON format is to return the list of MAObjects that correspond to the
> > request. I am sure you can come up with a good solution.
> >
> >
> >
> > Kind regard,
> >
> > Chris
> >
> >
> >
> > *From:* public-media-annotation-request@w3.org
> > [mailto:public-media-annotation-request@w3.org] *On Behalf Of *Felix
> Sasaki
> > *Sent:* maandag 1 maart 2010 20:35
> > *To:* Bailer, Werner
> > *Cc:* ???; Chris.Poppe@ugent.be; public-media-annotation@w3.org
> > *Subject:* Re: Update API document
> >
> >
> >
> > Hello Werner, Chris, all,
> >
> > I agree with your comments, esp. the non-alignment between the Web
> > Service Usage and the API. I am happy to change the Web Service usage
> > and implement other comments in this thread, but it would be great to
> > have an example for one property how the web service request should look
> > like.
> >
> > Many thanks in advance & best,
> >
> > Felix
> >
> > 2010/3/1 Bailer, Werner <werner.bailer@joanneum.at
> > <mailto:werner.bailer@joanneum.at>>
> >
> > Dear all,
> >
> >
> >
> > I think the API document has progressed a lot. I have the following
> > remarks (in addition to Chris’):
> >
> >
> >
> > - the first editorial note in section 2 can be removed, this is IMO now
> done
> >
> > - the second editorial note (SET functionality) could be turned into
> > text explaining the reasons for not including set functionality now.
> > Even if we decide to add it, it is unlikely to be mandatory for an
> > implementation.
> >
> > - the editorial note in the first sentence of “Web service” in 2.1 can
> > be removed, this is done with the Felix definitions
> >
> > - the image file for the figure in section 2.1 seems not to be at the
> > right place, also I suggest to use a PNG instead of a JPEG for a figure
> > like this
> >
> > - section 2.1 as the text references “scenario x” it might be useful to
> > add “scenario x: …” to the headings user agent and web service
> >
> > - if I saw that correctly, all return types inherit (at least) from
> > MAObject - should get Property return MAObject[] instead of object[] ?
> >
> > - 2.3.1.1 what is EASN? Was this meant to say ISAN?
> >
> > - 2.3.1.1 wrong indentation of the attribute of the Identifier interface
> >
> > - 2.3.1.3 the example for language should not say N/A
> >
> > - 2.3.2.4 <http://2.3.2.4>: typos: “altitudee” and “altitiude” (seems
> > someone doesn’t like this word ;-)
> >
> > - lists of possible value: this is quite inconsistent now, e.g. a list
> > of values for ma:contributor, but not for ma:creator; for some it seems
> > to make sense to put them directly into the document (e.g. types of
> > policy, and possibly relation), but for those where there can be many
> > values (genre, creator, contributor) we should reference a vocabulary we
> > consider best practice
> >
> >
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > Werner
> >
> >
> >
> > *From:* public-media-annotation-request@w3.org
> > <mailto:public-media-annotation-request@w3.org>
> > [mailto:public-media-annotation-request@w3.org
> > <mailto:public-media-annotation-request@w3.org>] *On Behalf Of *???
> > *Sent:* Samstag, 27. Februar 2010 16:03
> > *To:* Felix Sasaki; Chris.Poppe@ugent.be <mailto:Chris.Poppe@ugent.be>
> >
> >
> > *Cc:* public-media-annotation@w3.org <mailto:public-media-
> annotation@w3.org>
> >
> > *Subject:* RE: Update API document
> >
> >
> >
> > Hi. Felix, Chris and all.
> >
> > Most of all, thanks for Felix and Chris’s revision.
> >
> > I updated the API doc with Felix’s file. In addition I commit two
> > files(XML and HTML) from Felix to the CVS repository. Because I guess
> > Thierry is on the trip at this moment ;)
> >
> > So you can take a look at the last version of API doc via below link.
> >
> > http://dev.w3.org/2008/video/mediaann/mediaont-api-1.0/mediaont-api-
> 1.0.html
> >
> >
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > Wonsuk.
> >
> >
> >
> > *From:* public-media-annotation-request@w3.org
> > <mailto:public-media-annotation-request@w3.org>
> > [mailto:public-media-annotation-request@w3.org
> > <mailto:public-media-annotation-request@w3.org>] *On Behalf Of *Felix
> Sasaki
> > *Sent:* Friday, February 26, 2010 9:20 PM
> > *To:* Chris.Poppe@ugent.be <mailto:Chris.Poppe@ugent.be>
> > *Cc:* public-media-annotation@w3.org <mailto:public-media-
> annotation@w3.org>
> > *Subject:* Re: Update API document
> >
> >
> >
> > Hi Chris, all,
> >
> > 2010/2/25 Chris Poppe <chris.poppe@ugent.be
> <mailto:chris.poppe@ugent.be>>
> >
> > Now I really changed the subject of the mail so that people are not
> > confused.
> >
> > Kind regards,
> > Chris
> > --
> > Ghent University - Multimedia Lab
> > Sint-Pietersnieuwstraat 41
> > B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
> >
> > tel: +32 9 264 89 17
> > fax: +32 9 264 35 94
> > e-mail: Chris.Poppe@ugent.be <mailto:Chris.Poppe@ugent.be>
> >
> > URL: http://multimedialab.elis.ugent.be
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------- Weitergeleitete Nachricht ----------
> > From: "Chris Poppe" <chris.poppe@ugent.be <mailto:chris.poppe@ugent.be>>
> > To: "public-media-annotation@w3.org
> > <mailto:public-media-annotation@w3.org>" <public-media-annotation@w3.org
> > <mailto:public-media-annotation@w3.org>>
> > Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 08:25:40 +0100
> > Subject: RE: Updated ontology doc within Seoul F2F meeting
> > Dear all,
> >
> > please find attached an updated version of the API document (both xml
> > file and html file) (I am having troubles to upload this).
> >
> > Felix, after you add your updates could you please upload this?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > I made the updates, but unfortunately I am also currently not able to
> > commit to CVS. Thierry, could you do that? See
> >
> > http://fabday.fh-potsdam.de/~sasaki/mawg/ma-api-doc-20100226.zip
> > <http://fabday.fh-potsdam.de/%7Esasaki/mawg/ma-api-doc-20100226.zip>
> >
> > The ZIP-File contains an HTML-version of the draft, the XML-source, and
> > a diff between Chris' version and mine, to show you my edits. If there
> > are further comments today, I can make another editing round tonight.
> > Btw., I changed some of the non-webservice examples, since the output
> > seemed inconsistent, e.g. the writing conventions for DOMString result
> > types are not always the same. Also a question: should we have one
> > convention for properties names with multiple words, e.g. "named
> > fragments"? I would propose to use small caps and a hyphen always, e.g.
> > "named-fragments". What do people think?
> >
> > Best,
> >
> > Felix
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >     Current changes:
> >     added subtypes/roles
> >     added information on the use of the API (two use case scenarios)
> >     created new interface to hold language attribute.
> >     created new interface to hold uri, sourceformat, fragmentidentifier
> >     and mappingtype
> >     Updated the document with information on how to use the subtypes
> >
> >
> >     Kind regards,
> >     Chris
> >
> >     --
> >     Ghent University - Multimedia Lab
> >     Sint-Pietersnieuwstraat 41
> >     B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
> >
> >     tel: +32 9 264 89 17
> >     fax: +32 9 264 35 94
> >     e-mail: Chris.Poppe@ugent.be <mailto:Chris.Poppe@ugent.be>
> >
> >     URL: http://multimedialab.elis.ugent.be
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >


Received on Thursday, 4 March 2010 02:13:28 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 4 March 2010 02:13:28 GMT