W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-annotation@w3.org > March 2010

RE: The second revision of ontology doc after the Seoul F2F meeting

From: 이원석 <wslee@etri.re.kr>
Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2010 18:00:30 +0900
Message-ID: <B4EAD1122C31304099A5CDEA5447210F01E167AB@email2>
To: "Felix Sasaki" <felix.sasaki@fh-potsdam.de>
Cc: <public-media-annotation@w3.org>
Hi. Felix.

 

From: felix.sasaki@googlemail.com [mailto:felix.sasaki@googlemail.com] On Behalf Of Felix Sasaki
Sent: Monday, March 01, 2010 4:42 PM
To: 이원석
Cc: public-media-annotation@w3.org
Subject: Re: The second revision of ontology doc after the Seoul F2F meeting

 

Hi Wonsuk,



2010/3/1 이원석 <wslee@etri.re.kr>

Hi. Felix.

Thanks for your comment.

 

From: felix.sasaki@googlemail.com [mailto:felix.sasaki@googlemail.com] On Behalf Of Felix Sasaki
Sent: Sunday, February 28, 2010 7:46 PM
To: 이원석
Cc: public-media-annotation@w3.org
Subject: Re: The second revision of ontology doc after the Seoul F2F meeting

 

Hello Wonsuk,

great work! One minor comments below. IMO you don't need to integrate that before publication (which is not a last call draft anyway).

à Sure. but I would like to get the feedbacks after publishing more mature draft even it’s not a last call ;) 


http://dev.w3.org/2008/video/mediaann/mediaont-1.0/mediaont-1.0.html#property-value-types-definitions

I think we should check whether the XML Schema data types match the return types we use for the API. There might be subtle or larger differences, e.g. with dateTime. I am happy to take that action item, if people agree that it is useful.

à I am absolutely agreed.   Do you think we need to remove current texts for the publication ?


No, I don't think so. We will not publish a "last call" draft, so such a change is OK after publication. I would only propose to add a note like this, to warn readers, between "3 Property value type definitions" and "3.1 URI":

"Currently the data types are defined in terms of XML Schema, part 2. The Working Group intends to check and potentially modify these definitions, to ensure compatibility with the return types defined in the API for Media Resources 1.0"

What do you think?



à +1. It’s good information for the readers J

 

Thanks.

 

best regards,

Wonsuk.

 


Best,

Felix
 

	Thanks.

	 

	Best regards,

	Wonsuk

	
	Best,
	
	Felix

	2010/2/26 이원석 <wslee@etri.re.kr>

	Dear all,

	I updated ontology doc according to the comments from Werner and Veronique as below. 

	http://dev.w3.org/2008/video/mediaann/mediaont-1.0/mediaont-1.0.html


	 

	Please review of this document. 

	If you have any comment, please let me know. It’s really more than welcome J

	If there isn’t any comments for this version, This version will be published next week.

	 

	Best regards,

	Wonsuk.

	 

 

Received on Monday, 1 March 2010 09:01:05 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 1 March 2010 09:01:08 GMT