+1. Felix 2010/6/15 Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org> > Hi, > Regarding the LC comment > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2010Jun/0076.html > > It could be a good idea to indicate that the mappings we are covering in > our Ontology document are only informative. > Also the suggestion to create one Recommendation with the Ontology (the > normative stuff) and one W3C Note with the mappings identified is something > to be discussed. > > > This meets the other LC comment raising a formal objection. > about speex and VP8 not included in the Ontology > > http://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/42786/WD-mediaont-10-20100608/2393?cid=2393 > > > We will see if we have other people complaining about omitted formats. > We should ask these people to provide mapping tables. > > > Thierry. > >Received on Wednesday, 16 June 2010 06:59:54 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 16 June 2010 06:59:58 GMT