W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-annotation@w3.org > June 2010

Re: indicate that the mappings are only informative.

From: Felix Sasaki <felix.sasaki@fh-potsdam.de>
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 08:59:21 +0200
Message-ID: <AANLkTik-YLuaP16xjD8aOpNhtgDbFHMLmoCQDLgxua7Y@mail.gmail.com>
To: tmichel <tmichel@w3.org>
Cc: "public-media-annotation@w3.org" <public-media-annotation@w3.org>
+1.

Felix

2010/6/15 Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org>

> Hi,
> Regarding the LC comment
>
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2010Jun/0076.html
>
> It could be a good idea to indicate that the mappings we are covering in
> our Ontology document are only informative.
> Also the suggestion to create one Recommendation with the Ontology (the
> normative stuff) and one W3C Note with the mappings identified is something
> to be discussed.
>
>
> This meets the other LC comment raising a formal objection.
> about speex and VP8 not included in the Ontology
>
> http://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/42786/WD-mediaont-10-20100608/2393?cid=2393
>
>
> We will see if we have other people complaining about omitted formats.
> We should ask these people to provide mapping tables.
>
>
> Thierry.
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 16 June 2010 06:59:54 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 16 June 2010 06:59:58 GMT