W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-annotation@w3.org > June 2010

Re: [LC Comment ONT]

From: Daniel Park <soohongp@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 20:45:41 +0900
Message-ID: <AANLkTilR6Augg3KfQIZJzVmxjXdASlFPEmujUA4RfnWJ@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: "public-media-annotation@w3.org" <public-media-annotation@w3.org>
Obviously, we are targeting for W3C Recommendation.

It seems a trade-off issue. Light version can be deployed quickly even if
its mapping does not cover all of properties. That's why it's named as
(Media Ontology 1.0). 2.0 and 3.0 will be able to expand mappings as wide as
your expectation.


Soohong Daniel Park

On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 7:32 PM, JOSE MANUEL CANTERA FONSECA <jmcf@tid.es>wrote:

>  Is this specification going to be a Rec or a Note?
> because if this is going to be a Rec, you might be in trouble with your
> lightweight approach to mappings
> best
Received on Monday, 14 June 2010 11:46:09 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 14 June 2010 11:46:10 GMT