W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-annotation@w3.org > July 2010

Re: MAWG Minutes 2010-06-29

From: Felix Sasaki <felix.sasaki@fh-potsdam.de>
Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2010 10:03:54 +0200
Message-ID: <AANLkTimJPZel7DCJtjbLwffde6qcn-q-TMxpw5E8FJrt@mail.gmail.com>
To: tmichel <tmichel@w3.org>
Cc: public-media-annotation <public-media-annotation@w3.org>
2010/7/1 Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org>

>
>
> Felix Sasaki wrote:
>
>> Hi Thierry,
>>
>> 2010/7/1 Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org>
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>>
>>> I read in the minutes the following resolution:
>>>
>>> RESOLUTION: extend the LC period until the end of August.
>>>
>>> I am unsure if this mean that the LC period is extended for the external
>>> groups to provide comments (which we should to announce) or if the MAWG
>>> will
>>> start responding to the comments end of August.
>>>
>>> If it is the first case,
>>>
>>
>>
>> It is the first case.
>>
>>
>>  extending the LC period for external groups, I think it would not be a
>>> good
>>> choice. My experience is that Groups provide LC comments at the end of
>>> the
>>> period and in lots of cases, after that period. If we extend until end of
>>> August, we will delay reception of comments maybe until end of september.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> I have similar experiences with extending the review period. However, I
>> have
>> also the experiences that during the summer (break) many potential
>> reviewers
>> don't write reviews. That includes also the media fragments group. That
>> was
>> the background for our resolution.
>>
>
>
> I agree that in some cases, during the summer (break) many potential
> reviewers don't write reviews (It other cases some have the time to do so
> while the WG is running slow).
>
> If we ping during the summer, and remind that the review has ended on july
> 6th, groups should respond ASAP. If we extend to end of august, it will
> delay more the responses.



We have a call on July 6th (I think - Joakim?), let's decide about that at
the call. In any case we should make sure that the media fragments group has
time to make the review, no matter what the official deadline is.

Felix



>
>
>
>
>
>> Felix
>>
>>
>>
>>  I would prefer to kept the current deadline and ping external Groups to
>>> send their comments (as we have currently received very few of them).
>>>
>>> Thierry.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Felix Sasaki wrote:
>>>
>>>  Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> the chairs were not on the call. We had a meeting without them, see the
>>>> minutes at
>>>> http://www.w3.org/2010/06/29-mediaann-minutes.html
>>>> The minutes include some resolutions, which we would like to fix via
>>>> mail.
>>>> If you disagree with the one of the statements marked as "RESOLUTION",
>>>> please speak up ASAP via mail. Also, Daniel, Joakim, Thierry, we created
>>>> some action items for you.
>>>>
>>>> Felix
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>
Received on Thursday, 1 July 2010 08:04:28 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 1 July 2010 08:04:29 GMT