W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-annotation@w3.org > April 2010

Re: Request for LC approvals

From: Veronique Malaise <vmalaise@few.vu.nl>
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 17:29:16 +0200
Cc: "public-media-annotation@w3.org" <public-media-annotation@w3.org>
Message-Id: <9DF6DBE9-8B94-43D7-95BA-DB20761C9D15@few.vu.nl>
To: Joakim Söderberg <joakim.soderberg@ericsson.com>
In my revised version, I took the points
3,4,8,9
into account, I defined what we meant by ontology etc. But if you  
consider that this comment should be taken into account by adding a  
formal definition of what an ontology is in general, fair enough.  
About the difference between locator and identifier, I had changed the  
example, to show that they can be different, which is what the  
reviewers were asking for... What other changes are you planning to  
incorporate?

Best regards,
Véronique


On Apr 28, 2010, at 5:08 PM, Joakim Söderberg wrote:

> Dear WG members,
>
> I hereby ask for your approval to go on Last Call for the "Ontology  
> for Media Resource 1.0" (http://dev.w3.org/2008/video/mediaann/mediaont-1.0/mediaont-1.0.html 
> ) and "API for Media Resource 1.0" (http://dev.w3.org/2008/video/mediaann/mediaont-api-1.0/mediaont-api-1.0.html 
> ), with the inclusion of the following updates: http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/wiki/index.php?title=Issues_for_LC 
> , which will be applied before May 7.
>
> Best Regards
> Joakim Söderberg & Daniel Soohong
> co-Chair
> MAWG
Received on Wednesday, 28 April 2010 15:30:46 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 28 April 2010 15:30:47 GMT