Hello Christian, Therefore the question is what name is best? Compression, coding, encoding? The list of mime types is by no means as comprehensive as MPEG's list, which is why I took the position expressed in an earlier mail ;-) you have understood I would eliminate MIME in this context. By the way, Christian, any need to update http://www.ebu.ch/metadata/cs/ebu_AudioCompressionCodeCS.xml and http://www.ebu.ch/metadata/cs/ebu_VideoCompressionCodeCS.xml , which we had discussed in another life? Of course, mpeg codecs may not be the only compression schemes. If you believe that the classifications schemes maintained by EBU are incomplete, please do not hesitate to let me know. Regards, Jean-pierre From: Christian Timmerer (ITEC) [mailto:christian.timmerer@itec.uni-klu.ac.at] Sent: mercredi, 28. avril 2010 14:42 To: Evain, Jean-Pierre Cc: 'Silvia Pfeiffer'; Daniel Park; public-media-annotation@w3.org Subject: Re: [call for comments] ma:compression vs. ma:coding vs. ma:encoding MPEG has defined URI for its codecs and the list is available at http://mpeg.chiariglione.org/working_documents/general/URI.zip. Latest version (approved last week) is attached. Let me know in case something is missing. Best regards, -Christian ----------------------------------------- ************************************************** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error, please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by the mailgateway **************************************************Received on Wednesday, 28 April 2010 12:49:32 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 28 April 2010 12:49:33 GMT