Fwd: Editors for ontology doc (Action 164)

Sorry guys - just ckecked Joakims link and noticed that it actually  
was the entry i was talking of ;)

Sorry for the (maybe) confusing
___________________________
Dipl. Inf. Florian Stegmaier
Chair of Distributed Information Systems
University of Passau
Innstr. 43
94032 Passau

Room 248 ITZ
Tel.: +49 851 509 3063
Fax: +49 851 509 3062
stegmai@dimis.fim.uni-passau.de
___________________________
Quote of the week: Computer. This is a Class-A compulsory directive.
Compute, to the last digit, the value of pi. (Spock)

Anfang der weitergeleiteten E-Mail:

> Von: Florian Stegmaier <stegmai@dimis.fim.uni-passau.de>
> Datum: 21. Oktober 2009 15:32:05 MESZ
> An: Joakim Söderberg <joakim.soderberg@ericsson.com>
> Kopie: ??? <wslee@etri.re.kr>, Veronique Malaise  
> <vmalaise@few.vu.nl>, Tobias Bürger <tobias.buerger@sti2.at>, "<public-media-annotation@w3.or 
> g>" <public-media-annotation@w3.org>
> Betreff: Re: Editors for ontology doc (Action 164)
>

> Dear Joakim,
>
> i agree, that such a paragraph makes sense.
>
> I have seen, that the f2f agenda also has a time slot for media  
> ontology document. We should also keep in mind that there is a wiki  
> entry regarding ontology doc improvements. IMO we should use this  
> entry to summarize these topics.
>
> Best,
> Florian
>
> ___________________________
> Dipl. Inf. Florian Stegmaier
> Chair of Distributed Information Systems
> University of Passau
> Innstr. 43
> 94032 Passau
>
> Room 248 ITZ
> Tel.: +49 851 509 3063
> Fax: +49 851 509 3062
> stegmai@dimis.fim.uni-passau.de
> ___________________________
> Quote of the week: Computer. This is a Class-A compulsory directive.
> Compute, to the last digit, the value of pi. (Spock)
>
> Am 21.10.2009 um 12:55 schrieb Joakim Söderberg <joakim.soderberg@ericsson.co 
> m>:
>
>> Best Ontology Doc editors,
>> ,
>> I have assembled our answers to "Why not use DC?" under:
>> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/wiki/Improvements_/_Enhancement_for_a_revision_of_the_%22Ontology_for_Media_Resource_1.0%22_document
>>
>> My idea is that we could perhaps formualte a paragraph that  
>> explains why DC elements occur, and put it in version 2.0 of the  
>> Ontology Document.
>> In that way we will avoid having this question reoccur in the future!
>>
>> What do you say?
>>
>> /Joakim