Editors for ontology doc (Action 164) from Joakim Söderberg on 2009-10-21 (public-media-annotation@w3.org from October 2009)

From: Joakim Söderberg <joakim.soderberg@ericsson.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 12:55:57 +0200
To: "???" <wslee@etri.re.kr>, "Veronique Malaise" <vmalaise@few.vu.nl>, Tobias Bürger <tobias.buerger@sti2.at>, "Florian Stegmaier" <stegmai@dimis.fim.uni-passau.de>
Cc: <public-media-annotation@w3.org>
Message-ID: <4055256AED9D224D9442B19BF1C4C49004758D37@esealmw118.eemea.ericsson.se>

Best Ontology Doc editors,
,
I have assembled our answers to "Why not use DC?" under:
http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/wiki/Improvements_/_Enhancement_for_a_revision_of_the_%22Ontology_for_Media_Resource_1.0%22_document
 
My idea is that we could perhaps formualte a paragraph that explains why DC elements occur, and put it in version 2.0 of the Ontology Document.
In that way we will avoid having this question reoccur in the future!
 
What do you say?
 
/Joakim

Received on Wednesday, 21 October 2009 10:56:50 UTC