RE: ACTION-159: review of API document

Dear Woksuk,

Here is a proposal for the terminology section. Actually I think the following paragraph should be sufficient for what we are using now:

1.3 Terminology

In this document the terms "Media Resource", "Property", "Mapping" and "Property value type" are to be interpreted as defined in Section 2 of Ontology for Media Resource 1.0 [http://www.w3.org/TR/mediaont-10]. 

This mentions property value types, which should be moved from the ontology to the API document as Pierre Antoine suggested. In that case we should also move the definition of the term "Property value type".

Best regards,
Werner

> -----Original Message-----
> From: 이원석 [mailto:wslee@etri.re.kr]
> Sent: Dienstag, 13. Oktober 2009 11:58
> To: Bailer, Werner
> Cc: public-media-annotation@w3.org
> Subject: RE: ACTION-159: review of API document
> 
> Hi. Werner.
> 
> > - several property definitions mention resource and explain that it
> > can be an abstract concept or an instance. It think we should
> > reference section 2 of the ontology document in the introduction and
> > drop this explanation from each of the property descriptions
> 
> Concerning this issue, do you want to add new sub-clause as 1.3
> Terminology to the introduction section of API doc?
> I am a little bit confused how to revise the current API doc regarding
> this issue. :)
> 
> Best regards,
> Wonsuk.

Received on Tuesday, 13 October 2009 11:34:49 UTC