W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-annotation@w3.org > November 2009

Re: Definition of subproperties and way forward

From: Florian Stegmaier <stegmai@dimis.fim.uni-passau.de>
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 07:46:46 +0100
Message-Id: <38876D32-BABB-4736-A12E-D66BD27C04F7@dimis.fim.uni-passau.de>
To: Soohong Daniel Park <soohong.park@samsung.com>
Cc: Tobias Bürger <tobias.buerger@sti2.at>, Daniel Park <soohongp@gmail.com>, "public-media-annotation@w3.org" <public-media-annotation@w3.org>
+1

I also agree to postpone the subproperties discussion until we  
finished the basic mission.

Best,
Florian

___________________________
Dipl. Inf. Florian Stegmaier
Chair of Distributed Information Systems
University of Passau
Innstr. 43
94032 Passau

Room 248 ITZ
Tel.: +49 851 509 3063
Fax: +49 851 509 3062
stegmai@dimis.fim.uni-passau.de
___________________________
Quote of the week: Computer. This is a Class-A compulsory directive.
Compute, to the last digit, the value of pi. (Spock)

Am 24.11.2009 um 07:01 schrieb Soohong Daniel Park <soohong.park@samsung.com 
 >:

> Thanks Tobias for the clarification, That's my sense...!
>
>
> Daniel
>
> ------
> Soohong Daniel Park
> Samsung Electronics, DMC R&D
> http://sites.google.com/site/natpt00
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: public-media-annotation-request@w3.org [mailto:public-media-
>> annotation-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Tobias Burger
>> Sent: Monday, November 23, 2009 9:33 PM
>> To: 'Daniel Park'
>> Cc: public-media-annotation@w3.org
>> Subject: Re: Definition of subproperties and way forward
>>
>> +1 from my side as well.
>>
>> But as PA suggested, we should consider the necessary  
>> "placeholders" in
>> case we introduce subproperties in the future.
>>
>> Best
>>
>> Tobias
>>
>> Evain, Jean-Pierre wrote:
>>>
>>> +1, JP
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* public-media-annotation-request@w3.org
>>> [mailto:public-media-annotation-request@w3.org] *On Behalf Of  
>>> *Daniel
>> Park
>>> *Sent:* lundi, 23. novembre 2009 12:39
>>> *To:* public-media-annotation@w3.org
>>> *Subject:* Definition of subproperties and way forward
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Folks,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> We spent too much time for that issue both in Santa Clara and in
>>> mailing list. It's time to come up with a direction at this stage I
>>> believe. I (chair hat-on) don't have an objection with the summary
>>> below from Felix, also, that seems to us very reasonable way for the
>>> first step...
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Call for your opinion, any strong objection ?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> It will be also discussed finally at upcoming teleconf tomorrow.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Daniel
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Soohong Daniel Park
>>> Samsung Electronics, DMC R&D
>>> http://sites.google.com/site/natpt00
>>>
>>> [cut-and-paste]
>>>
>>> There seems to be one open question to me: Is it OK for us to start
>>> work on subproperties although we have not reached our goals even  
>>> with
>>> the simple properties? IMO, we should first for all simple  
>>> properties
>>> - define the API methods (done to some extend)
>>> - provide test cases and test suite material (not done at all)
>>> - run the tests with at least two implementations
>>> so that we can be sure to declare victory, even if we don't get to  
>>> the
>>> sub property part.
>>> So I am saying not "no" about sub properties, but postpone work on
>>> them until we have done our basic job.
>>>
>>> Would you and others agree with that?
>>>
>>> Best,
>>>
>>> Felix
>>>
>>
>> --
>> _________________________________________________
>> Dr. Tobias Bürger
>>
>> STI Innsbruck
>> University of Innsbruck, Austria
>> http://www.sti-innsbruck.at/
>>
>> tobias.buerger@sti2.at
>> __________________________________________________
Received on Tuesday, 24 November 2009 06:47:42 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 24 November 2009 06:47:44 GMT