W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-annotation@w3.org > November 2009

Re: Definition of subproperties and way forward

From: Felix Sasaki <felix.sasaki@fh-potsdam.de>
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 19:13:10 +0100
Message-ID: <ba4134970911231013l676d7588vfb31993a0bdc8606@mail.gmail.com>
To: Tobias Bürger <tobias.buerger@sti2.at>
Cc: Daniel Park <soohongp@gmail.com>, "public-media-annotation@w3.org" <public-media-annotation@w3.org>
2009/11/23 Tobias Bürger <tobias.buerger@sti2.at>

> +1 from my side as well.
>
> But as PA suggested, we should consider the necessary "placeholders" in
> case we introduce subproperties in the future.
>


Fine by me.

Best,

Felix


>
> Best
>
> Tobias
>
>
> Evain, Jean-Pierre wrote:
>
>>
>> +1, JP
>>
>>
>> *From:* public-media-annotation-request@w3.org [mailto:
>> public-media-annotation-request@w3.org] *On Behalf Of *Daniel Park
>> *Sent:* lundi, 23. novembre 2009 12:39
>> *To:* public-media-annotation@w3.org
>> *Subject:* Definition of subproperties and way forward
>>
>>
>> Folks,
>>
>>
>> We spent too much time for that issue both in Santa Clara and in mailing
>> list. It's time to come up with a direction at this stage I believe. I
>> (chair hat-on) don't have an objection with the summary below from Felix,
>> also, that seems to us very reasonable way for the first step...
>>
>>
>> Call for your opinion, any strong objection ?
>>
>>
>> It will be also discussed finally at upcoming teleconf tomorrow.
>>
>>
>>
>> Daniel
>>
>>
>> --
>> Soohong Daniel Park
>> Samsung Electronics, DMC R&D
>> http://sites.google.com/site/natpt00
>>
>> [cut-and-paste]
>>
>> There seems to be one open question to me: Is it OK for us to start work
>> on subproperties although we have not reached our goals even with the simple
>> properties? IMO, we should first for all simple properties
>> - define the API methods (done to some extend)
>> - provide test cases and test suite material (not done at all)
>> - run the tests with at least two implementations
>> so that we can be sure to declare victory, even if we don't get to the sub
>> property part.
>> So I am saying not "no" about sub properties, but postpone work on them
>> until we have done our basic job.
>>
>> Would you and others agree with that?
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Felix
>>
>>
> --
>  _________________________________________________
> Dr. Tobias Bürger
>
> STI Innsbruck
> University of Innsbruck, Austria
> http://www.sti-innsbruck.at/
> tobias.buerger@sti2.at
> __________________________________________________
>
>
Received on Monday, 23 November 2009 18:13:55 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 23 November 2009 18:13:57 GMT