W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-annotation@w3.org > November 2009

RE: Definition of subproperties and way forward

From: Evain, Jean-Pierre <evain@ebu.ch>
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 13:31:38 +0100
To: 'Daniel Park' <soohongp@gmail.com>, "public-media-annotation@w3.org" <public-media-annotation@w3.org>
Message-ID: <7D1656F54141C042A1B2556AE5237D6001006EB793EC@GVAMAIL.gva.ebu.ch>
+1, JP

From: public-media-annotation-request@w3.org [mailto:public-media-annotation-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Daniel Park
Sent: lundi, 23. novembre 2009 12:39
To: public-media-annotation@w3.org
Subject: Definition of subproperties and way forward

Folks,

We spent too much time for that issue both in Santa Clara and in mailing list. It's time to come up with a direction at this stage I believe. I (chair hat-on) don't have an objection with the summary below from Felix, also, that seems to us very reasonable way for the first step...

Call for your opinion, any strong objection ?

It will be also discussed finally at upcoming teleconf tomorrow.


Daniel

--
Soohong Daniel Park
Samsung Electronics, DMC R&D
http://sites.google.com/site/natpt00
[cut-and-paste]

There seems to be one open question to me: Is it OK for us to start work on subproperties although we have not reached our goals even with the simple properties? IMO, we should first for all simple properties
- define the API methods (done to some extend)
- provide test cases and test suite material (not done at all)
- run the tests with at least two implementations
so that we can be sure to declare victory, even if we don't get to the sub property part.
So I am saying not "no" about sub properties, but postpone work on them until we have done our basic job.

Would you and others agree with that?

Best,

Felix
Received on Monday, 23 November 2009 12:32:23 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 23 November 2009 12:32:23 GMT