W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-annotation@w3.org > May 2009

AW: Regrets for tomorrow`s Telecon (19.05.09)

From: Bailer, Werner <werner.bailer@joanneum.at>
Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 10:48:25 +0200
To: Veronique Malaise <vmalaise@few.vu.nl>, Florian Stegmaier <stegmai@dimis.fim.uni-passau.de>
CC: "public-media-annotation@w3.org" <public-media-annotation@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CD9846F872C7874BB4E0FDF2A61EF09F155C3E94BC@RZJC1EX.jr1.local>
Dear Véronique and Florian,

thanks for the update of the terminology section. I'm a bit confused that you use "media entity": I understood in the last telecon that we would not use entity? Also, the paragraph mentions the consistency in terminology with the fragments group, but afaik they use "media resource".

Best regards,

> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: public-media-annotation-request@w3.org [mailto:public-media-
> annotation-request@w3.org] Im Auftrag von Veronique Malaise
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 19. Mai 2009 10:04
> An: Florian Stegmaier
> Cc: public-media-annotation@w3.org
> Betreff: Re: Regrets for tomorrow`s Telecon (19.05.09)
> Dear all,
> You will find in attachment the html file of the Media Ontology
> document, please consider only the section "2.1 Terminology", that
> Florian and I have revised. We would be interested in your feedback
> about this section! I hope that we made the different notions a bit
> clearer :)
> The rest of the document is currently under revision by Wonsuk, to
> whom we will send the section "2.1 Terminology" if the group agrees
> with this version.
> Best regards,
> Véronique
Received on Tuesday, 19 May 2009 08:49:06 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:17:34 UTC