W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-annotation@w3.org > March 2009

Re: Suggestion how to move the mapping table forward

From: Felix Sasaki <felix.sasaki@fh-potsdam.de>
Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2009 19:04:17 +0900
Message-ID: <ba4134970903060204v409f0332pfc22b81374cc1734@mail.gmail.com>
To: Chris.Poppe@ugent.be
Cc: Tobias Bürger <tobias.buerger@sti2.at>, public-media-annotation@w3.org
2009/3/6 Chris Poppe <Chris.Poppe@ugent.be>

> I agree with Tobias and think that this can speed up the finalization of
> the
> mapping table.



I agree with Tobias and Chris, this is a very good idea. Nevertheless I
would like to make this effort independent of the draft publication
schedule. We will not "loose our face" ;) with unappropriate mappings being
made public (we are working in public anyway), and gathering feedback from
outside the group is as important as consensus within the group.

Felix



>
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Chris Poppe
>
> Ghent University - IBBT
> Faculty of Engineering
> Department of Electronics and Information Systems (ELIS)
> Multimedia Lab Gaston Crommenlaan 8 bus 201
> B-9050 Ledeberg-Ghent
> Belgium
>
>
> t: +32 9 33 14959
> f: +32 9 33 14896
> t secr: +32 9 33 14911
> e: chris.poppe@ugent.be
>
>
>
> URL: http://multimedialab.elis.ugent.be
>
> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> Van: public-media-annotation-request@w3.org
> [mailto:public-media-annotation-request@w3.org] Namens Tobias Bürger
> Verzonden: vrijdag 6 maart 2009 9:52
> Aan: public-media-annotation@w3.org
> Onderwerp: Suggestion how to move the mapping table forward
>
> Dear all,,
>
> I had a look at the current version of the mapping table again
> yesterday. From the discussion we had regarding ID3 I think that not
> every mapping is 100% correct or at least leaves room for changes. And
> what I also learned is that the meaning of some properties get clearer
> when you discuss them with other members of the group.
>
> I think we could improve the mappings if we make small groups to review
> the mappings. Each group can pick 1 or 2 formats and then we could
> discuss points of the mappings which are not clear.
>
> Having these reviews is necessary if we want to publish the mapping
> table, I guess.
>
> Perhaps we agree on small teams in the next telecon to review the
> mappings - what do you think?
>
> At the next telecon all group members should have indicated their
> preferences via the questionaire, so there would be a basis for the
> definition of the groups. We can also then prioritize some formats. So
> just an idea...
>
> Best regards,
>
> Tobias
>
> --
> _________________________________________________
> Dipl.-Inf. Univ. Tobias Bürger
>
> STI Innsbruck
> University of Innsbruck, Austria
> http://www.sti-innsbruck.at/
>
> tobias.buerger@sti2.at
> __________________________________________________
>
>
>
>
>
Received on Friday, 6 March 2009 13:36:29 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 6 March 2009 13:36:30 GMT