W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-annotation@w3.org > March 2009

RE: Answer to the liaison with MPEG

From: Soohong Daniel Park <soohong.park@samsung.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2009 13:07:42 +0900
To: 'Victor Rodriguez Doncel' <victorr@ac.upc.edu>, public-media-annotation@w3.org
Message-id: <014101c99d47$eea96ed0$cbfc4c70$%park@samsung.com>
Good information and thanks Victor.

After glancing at the attachment, I am feeling that MPEG needs to input
their XMX (plus API) framework to the MAWG. Is that correct ? Were there any
related technical debates or comments on that during MPEG meeting ?

Soohong Daniel Park
Standard Architect, blog.naver.com/natpt
DMC Business, Samsung Electronics. KOREA

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-media-annotation-request@w3.org [mailto:public-media-
> annotation-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Victor Rodriguez Doncel
> Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2009 11:42 PM
> To: public-media-annotation@w3.org
> Subject: Answer to the liaison with MPEG
> Hello,
> Although this document was issued by MPEG about three weeks ago, I am not
> sure whether it had been distributed or not.  I post it now anyway...
> Regards,
> Víctor
Received on Thursday, 5 March 2009 04:08:25 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:17:33 UTC