W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-annotation@w3.org > July 2009

Re: [W3C MAWG] action item 139: Check with Veronique (and Victor) the improvements 9-11 in the list.

From: Veronique Malaise <vmalaise@few.vu.nl>
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2009 13:13:29 +0200
Cc: public-media-annotation@w3.org
Message-Id: <B81083F3-C3F0-4594-8333-637CB7495446@few.vu.nl>
To: Florian Stegmaier <stegmai@dimis.fim.uni-passau.de>
Dear all,

And since them I did edit this section about the definition of an  
Ontology, and pointed to Wonsuk the part of the Ontology document  
where it can be copy-pasted. I also suggested several changes to the  
Media Ontology document's introduction section and I think that it  
would be good to go through the whole document once again, for the  
sake of clarity and coherence between the parts that have been changed  
independently. I will unfortunately not have the time to do this  
before September, because I have some deadlines before Aug 12, date at  
which I'll take my holidays.

Best,
Véronique


On Jul 21, 2009, at 12:52 PM, Florian Stegmaier wrote:

> Dear all,
>
> Here the email regarding the action item assigned to me.
>
> Best,
> Florian
>
> Anfang der weitergeleiteten E-Mail:
>
>> Von: Veronique Malaise <vmalaise@few.vu.nl>
>> Datum: 29. Juni 2009 13:00:27 MESZ
>> An: stegmai <stegmai@dimis.fim.uni-passau.de>
>> Kopie: victorr@ac.upc.edu, 이원석 <wslee@etri.re.kr>
>> Betreff: Re: MAWG: question regarding ontology 1.0 doc
>>
>> Hello!
>>>
>>> We just went though the improvement list [1] in the F2F in order  
>>> to thin it
>>> out. There are 3 items (item 9-11), which came up in one of your  
>>> emails. We
>>> are not quiet sure, if they are already solved.
>> Item 9 is solved, item 10: I have no particular belief about how to  
>> name this section, I was just raising the point in order to be sure  
>> that people agree on the section label, item 11: to my knowledge,  
>> this definition of what we mean by onotlogy is not explicitely  
>> specified in the document yet. Should I make a proposal and send it  
>> to the list before tomorrow's call? It is a matter of one or two  
>> lines, to say what an ontolgoy can be and what it is in our case :)
>>
>> Best,
>> Véronique
>>>
>>>
>>> Are these items allready closed form your side?
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> Florian
>>>
>>> [1]http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/wiki/Improvements_/_Enhancement_for_a_revision_of_the_%22Ontology_for_Media_Resource_1.0%22_document
>>>
>
>
> _____________________________
> Dipl. Inf. Florian Stegmaier
> Chair of Distributed Information Systems
> University of Passau
> Innstr. 43
> 94032 Passau
>
> Room 248 ITZ
> Tel.: +49 851 509 3063
> Fax: +49 851 509 3062
> stegmai@dimis.fim.uni-passau.de
> _____________________________
> Quote of the week: Computer. This is a Class-A compulsory directive.  
> Compute, to the last digit, the value of pi. (Spock)
>
>
>
>
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 21 July 2009 11:15:08 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 21 July 2009 11:15:08 GMT