W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-annotation@w3.org > April 2009

AW: [MAWG] MPEG-7 Mapping review

From: Bailer, Werner <werner.bailer@joanneum.at>
Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2009 12:02:37 +0200
Message-ID: <768DACDC356ED04EA1F1130F97D29852010F41EA@RZJC2EX.jr1.local>
To: Joakim Söderberg <joakim.soderberg@ericsson.com>, Tobias Bürger <tobias.buerger@sti2.at>
Cc: <public-media-annotation@w3.org>
Hi Joakim,

> That's a mistake. I can take the version from Tobias and paste in the property specification column from the update you sent to the mailing list the 6th March. > Do you think that is ok, or could it result in any problem?

That's ok, Tobias has already reviewed the mappings and sent me some comments, which could then be included into this new version.

The other thing I wonder is if property specifications have been defined for other formats as well which should be considered when reviewing.

Best regards,
Werner


> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-media-annotation-request@w3.org [mailto:public-media-
> annotation-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Bailer, Werner
> Sent: den 3 april 2009 13:32
> To: public-media-annotation@w3.org
> Subject: RE: [MAWG] MPEG-7 Mapping review
> 
> Dear Joakim, all,
> 
> I've seen in Tobias' reviewed sheet that the type of relation between the
> properties (Property column) is not filled for MPEG-7. I checked with the
> version of the file on the linked from the review page and found that they
> are missing there as well for most formats. I know that I've sent them for
> MPEG-7 and SMPTE, and probably others have for their formats.
> 
> Is there are reason why they are not included or did they just get lost? I
> think they should be reviewed together with the mappings for those formats
> for which they have been defined.
> 
> Best regards,
> Werner
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: public-media-annotation-request@w3.org
> > [mailto:public-media-annotation-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of
> > Tobias Bürger
> > Sent: Donnerstag, 02. April 2009 16:42
> > To: public-media-annotation@w3.org
> > Subject: [MAWG] MPEG-7 Mapping review
> >
> > Dear all,
> >
> > it seems as if my mail got lost this morning. So now I resend
> > it without
> > an attachment :-)
> >
> > I made the MPEG-7 review yesterday. Please find it here:
> > http://tobiasbuerger.com/w3c/mapping_table_MPEG-7_review_tobias.xls
> >
> > (btw. there I used the mapping table which had the error with
> > unresolved
> > references in the sheet which affects the DIG35 part).
> >
> > I added two columns to the MPEG-7 sheet:
> >
> > (1) My assessment of the mapping: Y=green (correct), N=red (wrong),
> > U=yellow (unclear; might be wrong)
> > (2) Suggestion: In this column I propose other elements to map to
> >
> > I hope the format of the review is OK.
> >
> > At some points in the original mapping document some elements seem to
> > have slipped into the wrong cells. I provide suggestions for
> > correction
> > in the "suggestion" column.
> >
> > For some elements I was not totally clear because my MPEG-7 schema did
> > not include documentation of the elements. So I am not sure about all
> > mappings. Perhaps my unclear points get clearer as soon as Jean-Pierre
> > has provided his review.
> >
> > A valuable source for at least the Dublin Core part of the mapping can
> > be found in [1].
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > Tobias
> >
> >
> > [1] Hunter, J. (2000-10). A Proposal for the Integration of
> > Dublin Core
> > and MPEG-7. ISO/IEC JTC1/SC29/WG11, 54th MPEG Meeting M6500. Available
> > online: http://espace.library.uq.edu.au/eserv/UQ:151491/m6500.pdf
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > _________________________________________________
> > Dipl.-Inf. Univ. Tobias Bürger
> >
> > STI Innsbruck
> > University of Innsbruck, Austria
> > http://www.sti-innsbruck.at/
> >
> > tobias.buerger@sti2.at
> > __________________________________________________
> >
> >
> >
Received on Sunday, 5 April 2009 10:06:58 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 5 April 2009 10:06:58 GMT