W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-annotation@w3.org > April 2009

Re: draft for "Canonical Processes" Use Case and updates to the UC and Req document

From: Tobias Bürger <tobias.buerger@sti2.at>
Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2009 16:47:00 +0200
Message-ID: <49D4CFE4.5010506@sti2.at>
To: Veronique Malaise <vmalaise@few.vu.nl>
CC: Felix Sasaki <felix.sasaki@fh-potsdam.de>, public-media-annotation@w3.org
Hi Veronique,

I think this use case is very interesting.

Felix is right when he says that the information management issue, i.e.
the recording of the metadata which might occur in the processes, has to
be mainly solved in that area.

But I also agree to Veronique, that a great problem is, that different
tools which are used in the media production lifecycle use different
metadata formats. Which means as soon as a media item is imported into
an application, the metadata might be lost. And I also see a
contribution from our media ontology there, i.e. to provide the means to
transform between the formats. We experienced this problem in one of the
projects I worked in.

Best,

Tobias

Veronique Malaise schrieb:
> Hello Felix,
>
> I could probably come up with an example, I could also borrow the one
> developped by Raphael at the workshop of the SAMT conference, if this
> could be authorised :)
> The problem is not so much of passing on metadata as such, it is that
> the metadata are encoded in different formats that are not dealt with
> in the other processes, although some properties might be interesting
> to propagate: some keywords or tags, creating date etc can be assigned
> at different moments in the life cycle, but expressed in different
> metadata schemas. Which is the part where the Ontology could have a
> role to play. If I understood correctly, of course :)
>
> Best,
> Véronique
>
>
> On Apr 2, 2009, at 4:27 PM, Felix Sasaki wrote:
>
>> Hello Veronique,
>>
>> the text looks good to me, but I have two questions: Do you have an
>> example of a property which specifically would help for the
>> "Canonical Processes" use case? Also, is the problem not an issue of
>> information management in the media life cycle, and has to be solved
>> in that area, at least in addition to the ontology?
>>
>> Felix
>>
>> 2009/4/2 Veronique Malaise <vmalaise@few.vu.nl
>> <mailto:vmalaise@few.vu.nl>>
>>
>>     Hi everyone!
>>
>>     Following my Action Item, here is a draft of a Use case that
>>     would correspond to the "canonical processes" applied to a media
>>     document, as discussed in the last teleconference (). All
>>     comments are welcome!
>>
>>     I also updated the current Use Case and Requirement document
>>     according to the list's comments and reactions.
>>
>>     Best regards,
>>     Véronique
>>
>>     Title: Canonical Processes Use Case
>>
>>     Summary: The life cycle of a media document undergoes different
>>     processes, which have all different canonical metadata properties
>>     and schemas. It is not trivial to pass on valuable metadata,
>>     generated during one process, to the next process. The Media
>>     Ontology could enhance the transmission of metadata in this chain
>>     that has been identified as the "Canonical Processes" [1]
>>
>>     Related Requirements:
>>     Requirement r01: Providing methods for getting structured or
>>     unstructured metadata out of media objects in different formats
>>     Requirement r05: Providing the ontology as a simple set of properties
>>
>>     Description / Example:
>>     As described in [1]:
>>     "Creating compelling multimedia presentations is a complex
>>     task. It involves the capture of media assets, then editing
>>     and authoring these into one or more final presentations.
>>     Tools tend to concentrate on a single aspect to reduce the
>>     complexity of the interface. While these tools are tailored to
>>     support a specific task, very often there is no consideration
>>     for input requirements for the next tool down the line. Each
>>     tool has the potential for adding semantic annotations to the
>>     media asset, describing relevant aspects of the asset and why
>>     it is being used for a particular purpose. These annotations
>>     need to be included in the information handed on to the
>>     next tool."
>>     The Media Ontology would help the information transfer or access
>>     between these different processes.
>>
>>     [1] Lynda Hardman. Canonical Processes of Media Production. In
>>     Proceedings of the ACM Workshop on Multimedia for Human
>>     Communication - From Capture to Convey (MHC 05), November 11, 2005.
>>
>>
>

-- 
_________________________________________________
Dipl.-Inf. Univ. Tobias Bürger

STI Innsbruck
University of Innsbruck, Austria
http://www.sti-innsbruck.at/

tobias.buerger@sti2.at
__________________________________________________
Received on Thursday, 2 April 2009 14:44:53 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 2 April 2009 14:44:53 GMT