W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-annotation@w3.org > September 2008

Re: Introduction

From: RaphaŽl Troncy <Raphael.Troncy@cwi.nl>
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 21:07:45 +0200
Message-ID: <48E27901.2030002@cwi.nl>
To: Joakim SŲderberg <joakim.soderberg@ericsson.com>
CC: public-media-annotation@w3.org

Dear Joakim,

> First accept my apologies for missing the telephone conference; I am not 
> familiar with W3C procedures. I expected a notification email that the 
> group had started to work, since I reported my interest to participate 
> about six months ago.

Yep, is it possible Felix to have WG participants automatically
subscribed to the public mailing list?

[...]

> Some other issues I have came across are item matching (how do you 
> identify a work), distinction between description of the work (editorial 
> metadata) and its instantiations (manifestations) and cross content 
> recommendations.

Do you mean the distinction one can find, for example, in the FRBR model
(Work - Expression - Manifestation - Item) [1], in the VRA model (Work
versus Image) [2], in the CRM model (Information Carrier versus
Information Object) [3], or in the MPEG-7 model (MediaInstance versus
MediaProfile)?

Do you think such distinction should be available in the future Media
Ontology this group will propose? Do you have any use cases where such a
distinction is important for describing videos?

Best regards.

   RaphaŽl

[1] http://www.frbr.org/
[2] http://www.vraweb.org/
[3] http://cidoc.ics.forth.gr/

-- 
RaphaŽl Troncy
CWI (Centre for Mathematics and Computer Science),
Kruislaan 413, 1098 SJ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
e-mail: raphael.troncy@cwi.nl & raphael.troncy@gmail.com
Tel: +31 (0)20 - 592 4093
Fax: +31 (0)20 - 592 4312
Web: http://www.cwi.nl/~troncy/
Received on Tuesday, 30 September 2008 19:08:29 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 10 October 2008 05:33:19 GMT