W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-annotation@w3.org > November 2008

Re: Reminder: XMP review

From: Víctor Rodríguez Doncel <victorr@ac.upc.edu>
Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2008 11:44:31 +0100
Message-ID: <49141C0F.8060703@ac.upc.edu>
To: Raphaël Troncy <Raphael.Troncy@cwi.nl>
CC: Thierry Michel <tmichel@w3.org>, Joakim Söderberg <joakim.soderberg@ericsson.com>, Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>, public-media-annotation@w3.org

Dear Raphaël,

My objection about "xmpRights:WebStatement"  (which I understand is the 
closest) is that the "license" is remote and this could hinder its use 
(e.g. think of a non-connected situation).
Having a remote pointer is fine, but allowing an inline license would be 
better, hence my comment...

Víctor Rodríguez Doncel

Raphaël Troncy escribió:
> Dear Victor,
>> I wonder whether this text fields could be improved so that they 
>> include richer information. For example, a RDF version of a 
>> CreativeCommons license (appart from the CC symbols, there is a RDF 
>> version to express "Non-Commercial" etc.), or a pattern License in 
>> whichever Rights Expression Language etc.
>> Wouldn´t it be nice having a picture and its licensing terms together?
> Absolutely! We have already discussed that on the mailing list, see 
> for example: 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2008Oct/0003.html 
> Furthermore, we have discussed that issue during the face to face 
> meeting in Cannes, with the PLING working group (see 
> http://www.w3.org/2008/10/24-mediaann-minutes.html#item05)
> So, YES, we should have a placeholder for pointing to machine readable 
> and human readable licence, but it seems to me that XMP allows already 
> to do that via the properties "xmpRights:Certificate" and/or 
> "xmpRights:WebStatement" that both have values a URL that can point to 
> such a licence.
> Best regards.
>   Raphaël
Received on Friday, 7 November 2008 10:45:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:17:31 UTC