W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-annotation@w3.org > November 2008

Re: [new use case suggestion] Use Case - Digital imaging lifecycle

From: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2008 02:26:18 +0900
Message-ID: <490F343A.8020809@w3.org>
To: Pierre-Antoine Champin <swlists-040405@champin.net>
CC: Rubén Tous <rtous@ac.upc.edu>, public-media-annotation@w3.org

Pierre-Antoine Champin さんは書きました:
> Felix Sasaki a écrit :
>>
>> Hello Ruben, all,
>>
>> sorry for the late reply. Reading your proposal I think it is 
>> interesting for the photo use case. However I remember that we 
>> discussed at the f2f meeting about the focus of the Working Group, 
>> and most of the people want it to be video, with the possibility to 
>> take other use cases into account if their requirements overlap more 
>> or less with video.I am a bit worried that your description is too 
>> far away from that use case. What do others think?
>
>
> Although the examples given by Rubén are quite specific to still 
> images, it seems to me that a similar kind of concern exist for video: 
> video can be digitalized from analog media, captured by digital 
> devices or generated; they can be altered in several ways 
> (re-encoding, subtitling, montage...).

Good point. I think an implementation of this is to  separate actors or 
roles like creator, changer and consumer. This is what the metadata 
working group deliverable does, see section 2 of
http://www.metadataworkinggroup.com/pdf/mwg_guidance.pdf
However what you are mentioning and what Ruben describes sounds to me 
rather like a requirement than a use case, that is the requirement to 
take such roles into account for relating various metadata vocabularies. 
What do you think?

Felix
Received on Monday, 3 November 2008 17:27:30 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 3 November 2008 17:27:30 GMT