W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-annotation@w3.org > December 2008

Re: Use Cases and Requirements , First Public Draft.

From: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 22:24:39 +0900 (JST)
Message-ID: <2382.218.110.62.32.1229606679.squirrel@webmail.w3.mag.keio.ac.jp>
To: "Thierry Michel" <tmichel@w3.org>
Cc: "public-media-annotation@w3.org" <public-media-annotation@w3.org>, Joakim S?derberg <joakim.soderberg@ericsson.com>, "Daniel Park" <soohong.park@samsung.com>

Hi Thierry,

>
> Felix,
>
> The Use Cases and Requirements for Media Ontology 1.0 is currently
> published at
> http://dev.w3.org/2008/video/mediaann/mediaont-req/mediaont-req.html
>
> What is the rationale for using http://dev.w3.org/ and not usual
> http://www.w3.org/ ?

I am using dev.w3.org for drafts, just since I'm used to do that from
other Working Groups, e.g. Web Services Policy
http://dev.w3.org/2006/ws/policy/
and I like to separate directories for drafts vs. Working Group directories.

>
> http://dev.w3.org/ does not seem to be available through jigedit, and
> Amaya, nor Webdav. therefore not very convenient to work on. (except if
> you are using XML spec).

We are using XML spec.


> Also no validator tools provided on this server.

That's right. However you usually don't need these tools then you use XML
spec.

>
>
> Therefore I have moved the document to
> http://www.w3.org/2008/video/mediaann/mediaont-req/mediaont-req.html
>
> and have done the following edits on it

Many thanks for these edits and checking! However, it seems that you did
not edit the XML spec source. Since you will be staff contact of this WG
soon, I propose that the chairs, editors and you decide whether to edit
the HTML directly or continue to work with XML spec. XML spec has the
advantage that the TOC and various links and numberings, with targets like
sections, figures, bibliographical items etc., are generated
automatically, and I personally have a high preference for it. So that's
up to you.

For now, that is for the upcoming publication, I would like to continue to
work with XML spec. Would that be fine with you?

Best,

Felix


>
> - Added proper heading section, title, version URIs.
> - Added Status of this Document section, according to W3C publication
> rules.
> - Fixed HTML errors.
>
> 1- The document now passes the HTML validator
> http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://www.w3.org/2008/video/mediaann/mediaont-req/mediaont-req.html
>
> 2- Broken links validator
> http://validator.w3.org/checklink?url=http://www.w3.org/2008/video/mediaann/mediaont-req/mediaont-req.html
>
> There are 14 brokens links to be fixed
> mainly a serie of URIs like this
> href="http://www.w3.org/2008/video/mediaann/mediaont-req/req-r04"
> should probably be
> href="http://www.w3.org/2008/video/mediaann/mediaont-req.html#req-r04"
>
> I would also suggest not using absolute URIs, as it will cause problem
> when moving the document to TR.
> Rather use
> href="mediaont-req.html#req-r04"
>
>
> Also we use  two URIs as examples
> http://cheap-vod.com/ (1 occurrence)
> http://library.myschool.edu/rose.ogv#some_fragment_identifier
>
> I recommend using (per W3C rules based on rfc2606) to avoid non resolved
> URIs
>
> http://www.example.org/cheap-vod.com/
> http://www.example.org/library.myschool.edu/rose.ogv#some_fragment_identifier
>
>
>
> 3- The document is now W3C Publication rules conformant
> http://www.w3.org/2005/08/online_xslt/xslt?xmlfile=http%3A%2F%2Fcgi.w3.org%2Fcgi-bin%2Ftidy-if%3FdocAddr%3Dhttp%253A%252F%252Fwww.w3.org%252F2008%252Fvideo%252Fmediaann%252Fmediaont-req%252Fmediaont-req.html&xslfile=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2005%2F08%2Fonline_xslt%2Fxslt%3Fxmlfile%3Dhttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2005%2F07%2Fpubrules%253Fuimode%253Dchecker_full%2526year%253D2008%2526docstatus%253Dfpwd-wd-tr%2526rectrack%253Don%2526prevrec%253Dnone%2526patpol%253Dw3c%2526normative%253Dyes%2526uri%253Dhttp%25253A%25252F%25252Fwww.w3.org%25252F2008%25252Fvideo%25252Fmediaann%25252Fmediaont-req%25252Fmediaont-req.html%2526filterValues%253D%2526nscheckmanual%253D%2526display%253Dall%2526recursive%253Doff%2526recurse_auth%253Don%26xslfile%3Dhttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2005%2F09%2Fchecker%2Fframe.xsl%26display%3Dall%26recurse_auth%3Don&uimode=checker_full&filterValues=&year=2008&docstatus=fpwd-wd-tr&rectrack=on&prevrec=none&patpol=w3c&normative=yes&doc_uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2008%
> 2Fvideo%2Fmediaann%2Fmediaont-req%2Fmediaont-req.html&recursive=off&nscheckmanual=&display=all&recurse_auth=on
>
> Cheers,
>
> Thierry.
>
>
>
Received on Thursday, 18 December 2008 13:25:16 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 18 December 2008 13:25:16 GMT