Re: Doodles for a regular meeting

Dear math-on-webpages CG,

Looking at the doodle, Dani and I would like to suggest

*Last Thursday of the month at 6pm UTC*

as a monthly meeting time for the CG,* starting on July 28.*

I think Google Hangouts worked out well last time and so I will send out a
link before the meeting. If this poses any kind of problem, please let me
or Dani know and we'll figure out an alternative.

Looking forward to the next meeting!

Best wishes,
Peter.

On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 5:49 PM, Peter Krautzberger <
peter.krautzberger@mathjax.org> wrote:

> Dear math-on-webpages CG,
>
> So we screwed up a little. It seems I accidentally created an anonymous
> doodle and it got automatically deleted.
>
> Could you please fill out the new doodle?
>
> It lives at http://doodle.com/poll/5dx7s97e2ea63a9f.
>
> Please consider both
>
> a) a general day of the last week of the month
> b) the specific week for the next meeting!
>
> Sorry for the inconvenience of losing the last pol!
>
> Looking forward to catching up with the entire group again!
> Best regards,
> Peter.
>
> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 11:56 AM, Peter Krautzberger <
> peter.krautzberger@mathjax.org> wrote:
>
>> Dear math-on-webpages CG,
>>
>> Just a follow up on this. If you haven't filled out the doodle, please do.
>>
>> Right now there are 8 replies and the only universal option is Fridays at
>> 2pm UTC -- which would probably be prohibitive for US West Coast people. We
>> might want to consider alternating meeting times to make this work.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Peter.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 10:27 AM, Peter Krautzberger <
>> peter.krautzberger@mathjax.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Dear math-on-webpages CG,
>>>
>>> As promised, here's the next doodle. [1].
>>>
>>> This time, we're looking for a regular time to meet up so please ignore
>>> the specific dates and just focus on days/time
>>>
>>> As discussed in the inaugural meeting, we should focus on working
>>> asynchronously using the mailing list (and wiki and GitHub repo if we want).
>>>
>>> Since our topic is very broad, I'd expect most conversations to focus on
>>> smaller groups of relevant experts (e.g., layout, editing, accessibility,
>>> interchange). Anyone should feel free to get together in smaller meetings
>>> if that helps.
>>>
>>> Still, most people were interested in meeting regularly once a month,
>>> some advocating bi-weekly meetings for the early phase. So I suppose:
>>> please discuss!
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Peter.
>>>
>>> [1] http://doodle.com/poll/g54vmh2n9vxq5sgu
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>