Re: Closing MathML Refresh GitHub issues

Hello David,

Thanks for the suggestion. We already have a label "tests needed", I
guess we can probably have extra labels to indicate the need to update
specifications...

On 02/05/2019 14:41, David Farmer wrote:
>
> Dear Frédéric (and all!),
>
> It would be good to have a milestone, or maybe a tag,
> on those issues which have been decided but can't be closed for
> some other reason.  That will help people see progress and also make
> it easier to remember the status.
>
> Regards,
>
> David
>
>
> On Thu, 2 May 2019, Frédéric Wang wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I've re-opened some GitHub issues about decisions made in previous
>> meetings.
>>
>> I think before closing an issue we should not only ensure that there is
>> a consensus but also that the corresponding changes have been made in
>> the MathML Core and MathML Full specification and that we have WPT tests
>> covering these changes. Optionally, we should report bugs to
>> Mozilla/WebKit bug trackers.
>>
>> -- 
>> Frédéric Wang
>>
>>
>>

-- 
Frédéric Wang

Received on Thursday, 2 May 2019 12:53:28 UTC