Re: Updated invitation with note: MathML Refresh Meeting

On 12/02/2019 12:32, David Carlisle wrote:
> On 12/02/2019 11:13, Frédéric Wang wrote:
> > I'm not familiar with that. Can you please explain what is this
> > discussion about versioning?
>
> Whatwg-flavoured html is a "living document" with rolling updates and no
> version number, w3c-flavoured html is versioned (currently at 5.2)
> I don't think it's any secret that there is a certain amount of tension
> behind HTML being published by two organisations with two versioning
> strategies.
> We just need to fit in with both in the least disruptive way possible...

OK, I guess we should follow W3C's versioning rules if the plan is to
release as a W3C spec in the future. IIUC, browser implementers
generally just rely on the Working Draft versions.

Also, for WhatWG theHTML editors are pretty liberal about pointing to
the current best spec. So I think we could have
https://html.spec.whatwg.org/#mathml pointing to MathML Core draft once
we have a stable URL on our side and the draft is a bit more advanced.
We'd want 2/3 browsers to sign off on this reference though.

-- 
Frédéric Wang