Re: header syntax.

On 22 Nov 2012, at 23:39, marbux <marbux@gmail.com> wrote:

> A somewhat different approach
> when implementations' markup differs

It has already been established[1] that the implementation DON'T differ.
There are all in line with the spec in regard to the headers.

Why should a new spec differ from all that?

 Max

[1]: http://johnmacfarlane.net/babelmark2/?text=Header+Level+1+underlined%0A%3D%3D%3D%3D%3D%3D%3D%3D%3D%3D%3D%3D%3D%3D%3D%3D%3D%3D%3D%3D%3D%3D%3D%3D%3D%0A%0AHeader+level+2+underlined%0A-------------------------%0A%0A%23+Header+level+1+hash%0A%23%23+Header+level+2+hash%0A%23%23%23+Header+level+3+hash%0A%23%23%23%23+Header+level+4+hash%0A%23%23%23%23%23+Header+level+5+hash%0A%23%23%23%23%23%23+Header+level+6+hash%0A%0A%23+Header+level+1+hash+%23%0A%23%23+Header+level+2+hash+%23%23%0A%23%23%23+Header+level+3+hash+%23%23%23%0A%23%23%23%23+Header+level+4+hash+%23%23%23%23%0A%23%23%23%23%23+Header+level+5+hash+%23%23%23%23%23%0A%23%23%23%23%23%23+Header+level+6+hash+%23%23%23%23%23%23%0A