- From: Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2012 08:19:39 +0000
- To: Markdown List <public-markdown@w3.org>
On 22 November 2012 02:17, Karl Dubost <karld@opera.com> wrote:
>
> Le 21 nov. 2012 à 23:37, Joshua Kalis a écrit :
>> I think that the underline syntax is ugly and needless with '# header' or '# header #'.
>
> We do not have the choice.
>
> Babelmark2 shows that most of processors support the three syntaxes.
> http://bit.ly/Ug3yfj
We do have a choice :-) But that seems a resounding vote for ... 3
Just to confirm the 3 you mention.
== underline (h1 only)
-- underline (h2 only)
#{1..6} All values.
What a mess! We do need to address the corner cases though and tidy them up?
E.g. terminating #'s, matching number of hashes, text after hashes etc.
Alternative view. For a core profile. Support only #'s, with terminators.
That allows conformance across implementations.
Then the variations would fall into either intermediate or
app-specific profiles?
Thoughts?
--
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
Docbook FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk
Received on Thursday, 22 November 2012 08:20:09 UTC