Re: Moving on. A basic para

On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 9:04 AM, Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com> wrote:

> So the blank line isn't a paragraph then? The complexity comes if we
> skip the \w+ of the blank line and take \n\w+\n as terminating the
> preceding para?
>

\n\w*\n but yes.


> IMHO that is an unnecessary complexity?
>

It may be, but I'm loathe to write a spec that invalidates markdown
documents that adhere to the well-defined portions of Gruber's initial
rules, as I think doing so would decrease the adoption rate.

Ryan