Re: Missing resources section in Non-text Contrast understanding doc & missing Non-text Contrast user need in requirements doc

Laura,
good catch on all points.
Especially the Low Vision Needs. I think we can mine previous unmerged
understanding drafts, from before they merged SC was created, and the
related emails to craft something.

Jim

On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 9:46 AM, Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi Alastair, Jim, and all,
>
> I noticed that the standard "Resources" section is missing from the
> Non-text Contrast Understanding document [1].
>
> So I started looking around for links that could be added to populate
> that section. We may want to list the email  from:
>
> * Smith Kettlewell Eye Research Institute -  "If the text is better
> understood with the graphics , they should be equally visible as the
> text." [2]
> *  Gordon Legge - "Contrast requirements for form controls should be
> equivalent to contrast requirements for text" [3]
>
> In addition, it seems that all of our other understanding docs list
> our "Accessibility Requirements for People with Low Vision" [4] as the
> first link in the "Resources" section. However, it appears that our
> requirements doc [4] doesn't have a specific user need for non-text
> contrast. Should we consider adding it?
>
> Thanks.
>
> Kindest Regards,
> Laura
>
> [1] https://rawgit.com/w3c/wcag21/non-text-contrast/
> understanding/21/non-text-contrast.html
> [2] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-low-vision-a11y-
> tf/2017May/0007.html
> [3] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-low-vision-a11y-
> tf/2017Jun/0054.html
> [4] https://www.w3.org/TR/low-vision-needs/
>
> --
> Laura L. Carlson
>



-- 
Jim Allan, Accessibility Coordinator
Texas School for the Blind and Visually Impaired
1100 W. 45th St., Austin, Texas 78756
voice 512.206.9315    fax: 512.206.9452 http://www.tsbvi.edu/
"We shape our tools and thereafter our tools shape us." McLuhan, 1964