Re: Infographics

see below

On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 5:59 AM, Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
wrote:

> Hi everyone,
>
> I just found a ton of (mostly passing?) infographics here:
> https://www.flickr.com/photos/gdsdigital/
>
> The copyright license is to allow sharing & reuse with attribution, so
> it's a reasonable source for testing or publications so long as it's
> attributed.
>
> It would be useful for a few people to look at a few and assess whether
> they think they would pass non-text-contrast, but also:
> - relying on colour
> - text (in graphics) contrast
>
> Most infographics I've found fail one of the current WCAG 2.0 ones, adding
> non-text-contrast isn't that big a deal overall.
>
> As a starter selection:
> https://www.flickr.com/photos/gdsdigital/4729221809/in/datetaken/

​blue circle and yellow-green circle - fail
white circle and yellow-green circle - fail​

​text covers the meaning of the graphics that fail. tho there are text
contrast failures. ​


> https://www.flickr.com/photos/gdsdigital/4719771789/in/datetaken/

​pink and green​

​- fail
lite green and dark green - fail​
the text has the meaningful information.  but it fail text contrast

>
> https://www.flickr.com/photos/gdsdigital/4645105776/in/datetaken/

​beige and white - fail​
light beige and dark beige - fail
there is enough meaninful text near the failing graphics that the graphics
are redundant

is this what you want?


>
> -Alastair
>
>


-- 
Jim Allan, Accessibility Coordinator
Texas School for the Blind and Visually Impaired
1100 W. 45th St., Austin, Texas 78756
voice 512.206.9315    fax: 512.206.9452 http://www.tsbvi.edu/
"We shape our tools and thereafter our tools shape us." McLuhan, 1964