- From: Liam R. E. Quin <liam@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 03 May 2017 13:01:07 -0400
- To: John Foliot <john.foliot@deque.com>, public-cognitive-a11y-tf <public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org>, public-low-vision-a11y-tf <public-low-vision-a11y-tf@w3.org>
- Cc: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>, W3C WAI Accessible Platform Architectures <public-apa@w3.org>, public-rqtf@w3.org, DPUB mailing list <public-digipub-ig@w3.org>
On Wed, 2017-05-03 at 10:50 -0500, John Foliot wrote: > [...] > I began to wonder aloud if using a similar mechanism (up to, and > including piggy-backing on the Digital Publishing's IG concept of > 'manifest' above) might not be a more efficient and economical way of > capturing and conveying *personalization options* at a site-wide > level (as opposed to the "page" or single-screen > level). It might be; there's some dissent within the epub group(s) about whether a manifest is needed for pwp or could simply be LINK elements from an HTML file at the root. But for sure it's a concept worth considering. Liam -- Liam R. E. Quin <liam@w3.org> The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)
Received on Wednesday, 3 May 2017 17:01:23 UTC