- From: Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2017 07:38:41 -0500
- To: Wayne Dick <wayneedick@gmail.com>
- Cc: public-low-vision-a11y-tf <public-low-vision-a11y-tf@w3.org>
Hi Wayne, Great. Thank you! Kindest Regards, Laura On 6/12/17, Wayne Dick <wayneedick@gmail.com> wrote: > Looking over the literature I have concluded that 0.075em to .1em are best. > > Before posting everything I would like to take a day to verify all my > calculations. I will update the justification. > > There is controversy the crowding issue. Some say it has no effect. Others > claim it changes water into wine. Two articles stand out. An article by > Chung that demonstrates no effect, and an article by MacLeish that shows > significant effect. Since the MacLeish study took place in a more natural > setting I tend to favor it. Chung used a method called Rapid Serial Visual > Presentation a reading setting not used by many readers. > > Please wait a day for a detailed analysis. Last time I didn't take notes. > This time I don't want to make that mistake. > > Wayne > -- Laura L. Carlson
Received on Tuesday, 13 June 2017 12:39:16 UTC