Re: Combine 79, 78, and 74 SCs? (was Re: Mechanism Disclaimer)

I think it's getting better... this seems the easiest to understand

For those web technologies that allow user agents to change the foreground
and background colors, font family​, ​or the spacing between characters,
words, lines, or paragraphs, nothing is done in the content to prevent
these modifications.


On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 2:41 PM Gregg C Vanderheiden <greggvan@umd.edu>
wrote:

>
> On Jan 22, 2017, at 2:26 PM, White, Jason J <jjwhite@ets.org> wrote:
>
> Features of the technologies relied upon by the content are not used in a
> way that would restrict the ability, if any, of user agents to change
> foreground and background colors, font family​, ​or the spacing between
> characters, words, lines, or paragraphs
>
>
>
> I think this is the best of the lot — but it still is hard to interpret if
> you don’t know in advance what it is trying to get at -  AND why it is
> written with so many clauses….
>
>
> Here is an explanation (as far as I understand it) for what we are saying
> and why.
>
> Not all technologies have a way for users to change the foreground and
> background colors, font family​, ​or the spacing between characters, words,
> lines, or paragraphs.  But for those that do, such as HTML for text
> content, the Author should not use features in a way that would prevent
> these modifications.
>
> Hmmmm
>
> how about.
>
> aaFor those web technologies that allow user agents to change the
> foreground and background colors, font family​, ​or the spacing between
> characters, words, lines, or paragraphs, nothing is done in the content to
> prevent these modifications.
>
>
> OR
>
> Web content technologies are not used in a way that would prevent users
> from changing the foreground and background colors, font family​, ​or the
> spacing between characters, words, lines, or paragraphs, where the
> technologies used can allow such changes.
>
>
>
> g
>