- From: Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2016 15:59:51 -0600
- To: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
- Cc: public-low-vision-a11y-tf <public-low-vision-a11y-tf@w3.org>
Thanks Jon, I'll remove that bullet point. Kindest Regards, Laura On 11/17/16, Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Alastair, Jon and all, > > If Jon is okay with "available by any input method", I am okay with > taking out his "available on focus as well as hover" point. Jon? > > We made "not covered or obscured" part of the "fully visible" > definition hence we removed it from the bullet list. > > The original issue was not not tooltips obscuring other content. The > original issue the cursor overlapping the tooltip content making the > tooltip text unreadable. Check the illustrations: > > http://simplyaccessible.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/400percentTitleAttribute.png > https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/low-vision-a11y-tf/wiki/File:Obscured_tooltip_footnotes.png > https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/low-vision-a11y-tf/wiki/File:Obscured_tooltip_glossary.png > https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/low-vision-a11y-tf/wiki/File:Obscured_tooltip_mail.png > https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/low-vision-a11y-tf/wiki/File:Obscured_tooltip_firefox.png > > The idea of content appearing on hover obscuring other content was > added later. So now we are trying to incorporate both issues in this > one SC. > > Thanks. > > Kindest Regards, > Laura > > On 11/17/16, Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com> wrote: >> Hi Laura, >> >> I think “available by any input method” covers “available on focus as >> well >> as hover”, we only need the “any” version. >> >> The “not covered or obscured” has disappeared from the wiki, and in the >> email thread it has switched back again, or I’m going crazy? I thought >> the >> problem was the content appearing on hover obscuring other content, in >> which >> case it should be: >> >> Informational content which appears on hover that is necessary for >> understanding must: >> * be fully visible; >> * not obscure other content; >> * be available via any input method. >> >> For the testability section I updated it to match (it is a rather similar >> to >> the SC, is that ok?), and I added a possible new technique. >> >> Sounded like a productive meeting in the minutes, I should be there next >> week ☺ >> >> -Alastair >> >> >> On 17/11/2016, 20:13, "Laura Carlson" <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> The latest is at: >> https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/low-vision-a11y-tf/wiki/Metadata_On_Hover >> >> Alastair, any thoughts on verbiage to update the testablity section? >> >> All ideas for improvement most welcome. >> >> Kindest regards, >> Laura >> >> >> >> > > > -- > Laura L. Carlson > -- Laura L. Carlson
Received on Thursday, 17 November 2016 22:00:25 UTC