Re: Closing your Community Group?

I don't feel this group is necessary and agree it should probably be closed.

LRMI incorporated some of the LOM elements and is already available as RDF.

http://dublincore.org/dcx/lrmi-terms/

If there are any LOM elements that are missing or that members of this
group think should be added then perhaps the more appropriate action
is to engage the IEEE LTSC (https://ieee-sa.imeetcentral.com/ltsc/) or
the DCMI (http://dublincore.org/dcx/lrmi-terms/1.1/), especially since
the DCMI is now the steward of the LRMI work.





On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 10:21 AM, Coralie Mercier <coralie@w3.org> wrote:
>
>
> Dear all,
>
> Your Community Group is among the groups launched more than 6 months ago
> with 5 people or fewer and appears to be unused.
> The W3C Team proposes to *CLOSE* it in 10 days or so, per the Community and
> Business Group Process [1] (relevant parts quoted below), unless there are
> compelling arguments not to.
>
>
> [1] Community and Business Group Process
> <https://www.w3.org/community/about/agreements/>
>
> Duration and Closure of a Community Group
> -----------------------------------------
>
> Once a Community Group has been launched, participants may continue to
> work indefinitely, until the Community Development Lead closes the group;
> see the grounds for closure.
>
> No less than ten business days before closing a group, the Community
> Development Lead must alert the participants. Once closed, no individuals
> may join, and discussions stop. However, W3C makes available information
> about closed Community Groups and archives of their communications.
>
> Closed Community Groups are re-opened following the creation process.
>
>
> Grounds for Closure of a Community Group
> ----------------------------------------
> The Community Development Lead may close a Community Group in any of
> following circumstances:
>
>      Chair Request. The Group Chair requests that the group be closed
> (e.g., as the result of a group decision, or on a certain date selected in
> advance by the group).
>      Inactivity. The number of participants drops below 3 for an extended
> period, or because participant activity (e.g., as measured by
> communications among participants) ceases for an extended period.
>      Agreement Violations. When, in the judgment of the Community
> Development Lead, the group has committed a serious violation of this
> policy, for instance exceeding its scope.
>
> The Community Development Lead and Chair should discuss the group’s status
> before the Community Development Lead initiates closure.
>
> --
> Coralie Mercier  -  W3C Marketing & Communications -  http://www.w3.org
> mailto:coralie@w3.org +336 4322 0001 http://www.w3.org/People/CMercier/
>

Received on Monday, 11 April 2016 14:28:56 UTC