- From: Sarven Capadisli <info@csarven.ca>
- Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2018 19:33:23 +0100
- To: public-lod@w3.org
On 2018-03-15 22:24, Denny Vrandečić wrote: > It is serving RDF/XML being linked from the HTML, not as RDFa though. > > But even if it was embedded as RDFa, I still might want some way to see > and surf the data directly, no? Define "data". It seems to be that you associate "data" to RDF/XML but not HTML+RDFa. They are literally the same with different "views". One happens to be human-friendly, the other... you know. Running an additional process on top of RDF/XML and then to "render" an HTML is literally duplicating the same thing that could've been done with the original HTML+RDFa. The whole point is that, if you provide HTML+RDFa, that is the "default" view that you (as the content publisher) deems to be a reasonable view for humans to consume - which is something you're currently doing any way but without RDFa - as well as making the *exact* same "data" consumable by machines. Any third-party application (like the "RDF browsers") can still consume the HTML+RDFa (just as they do with the RDF/XML) and offer their own "data directly" to you. -Sarven http://csarven.ca/#i
Received on Friday, 16 March 2018 18:33:48 UTC