- From: Sarven Capadisli <info@csarven.ca>
- Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2016 09:01:44 -0400
- To: Ruben Verborgh <ruben.verborgh@ugent.be>
- Cc: Linking Open Data <public-lod@w3.org>, Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>, azaroth42@gmail.com
On 2016-07-16 00:21, Ruben Verborgh wrote: > Hi Sarven, Phil, Rob, > >> Are there mediatypes that map to application/ld+json with a profile? > > This begs the question why one would want to do that. We're investigating to see what else is other than AS2 is making/stating such equivalences: application/activity+json and application/ld+json; profile="http://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams" To the best of my know knowledge, there aren't any. While I wholeheartedly appreciate the discussion on whether that's a good or bad idea, that wasn't at all my intention. [Aside: you are welcome to dig into past Social Web WG's discussions/meetings to see my strong position against the new mediatype.] The investigation was towards Linked Data Notifications: https://linkedresearch.org/ldn/ to see what it can mention in order to apply the robustness principle. It is a step towards helping people design flexible systems that wish to so they can be a bit more interoperable with other communities/implementations. That's being pragmatic. LDN is not inventing or proposing a new mediatype, it doesn't have a need for it, nor there are any plans for it, neither promoting "non-LD stuff". Lastly, LDN has already marked this as at risk and prepared to hand it off to the Social Web Protocols. https://github.com/csarven/ldn/issues/10 already addressed all this, satisfied all commenters, and marked as closed: * https://linkedresearch.org/ldn/#sending-activitystreams2-support * https://linkedresearch.org/ldn/#consuming-activitystreams2-support -Sarven http://csarven.ca/#i
Received on Saturday, 16 July 2016 13:02:28 UTC