- From: Paul Worrall <paul.worrall@interition.net>
- Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 10:48:58 +0100
- To: Ghislain Atemezing <auguste.atemezing@eurecom.fr>
- Cc: Graham Klyne <gk@ninebynine.org>, Martynas Jusevičius <martynas@graphity.org>, Semantic Web <semantic-web@w3.org>, public-lod <public-lod@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <202C3C30-43F8-42C1-BBED-72DA03378AF8@interition.net>
I don’t invest any more time on this project or semantic tech myself but if there was someone who wanted to do it I am happy to advise. > On 10 Aug 2016, at 10:40, Ghislain Atemezing <auguste.atemezing@eurecom.fr> wrote: > > Hi Paul, >> Le 10 août 2016 à 11:26, Paul Worrall <paul.worrall@interition.net <mailto:paul.worrall@interition.net>> a écrit : >> >> I had been working on describing software https://sparqlycode.com/ <https://sparqlycode.com/> . It used DOAP and PROV and its own vocab. Produced RDF/OWL representations of the code, its build, version history etc.. I could’t get an early adopter so I abondoned it last year. >> >> Would be happy to help someone pick up on the code. > > You can also help the community by submitting the vocabulary [0] for inclusion into LOV [1]. > That would be great and a good way to watch any adopter of the vocab. > > [0] http://lov.okfn.org/dataset/lov/suggest <http://lov.okfn.org/dataset/lov/suggest> > [1] lov.okfn.org/dataset/lov/ <http://lov.okfn.org/dataset/lov/> > >> >> >> Paul Worrall >> >> Interition: wisdom in the web >> >> web: www.interition.net <http://www.interition.net/>, www.zonafide.net <http://www.zonafide.net/> >> email: paul.worrall@interition.net <mailto:paul.worrall@interition.net> >> twitter: @interition >> mobile: +44 (0) 771 133 0213 >> phone: +44 (0) 203 637 5196 >> eth: 0x93d41b29acf6204c9a9f03e335988e498388a2cc >> >> Registered in England and Wales. Number 08460806 >> Registered office: Elm Barn, Stoke Golding Lane, Higham on the Hill, Nuneaton,CV13 6ES >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> On 9 Aug 2016, at 07:36, Graham Klyne <gk@ninebynine.org <mailto:gk@ninebynine.org>> wrote: >>> >>> On 08/08/2016 14:57, Martynas Jusevičius wrote: >>>> DOAP vocabulary comes very close: https://github.com/edumbill/doap <https://github.com/edumbill/doap> >>>> >>>> Too bad it looks to be unmaintained. Strangely, the schema does not >>>> seem to support relationships (dependencies) between projects. >>> >>> Just a thought: would DOAP + PROV fit the bill? >>> >>> #g >>> -- >>> >>> >> > > --------------------------------------- > Ghislain A. Atemezing, Ph.D > Mail: ghislain.atemezing@gmail.com <mailto:ghislain.atemezing@gmail.com> > Web: https://w3id.org/people/gatemezing <http://www.atemezing.org/> > Twitter: @gatemezing > About Me: https://about.me/ghislain.atemezing <https://about.me/ghislain.atemezing> > > > > > > > >
Received on Wednesday, 10 August 2016 09:49:30 UTC