- From: Neubert, Joachim <J.Neubert@zbw.eu>
- Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2015 20:14:15 +0000
- To: 'Niklas Petersen' <petersen@cs.uni-bonn.de>, "semantic-web@w3.org" <semantic-web@w3.org>, "public-lod@w3.org" <public-lod@w3.org>
Hi Niklas, Github (and similar services) offer a great platform to publish vocabularies and queries, particularly if they are evolving in sync and are backed with a corresponding endpoint. How we managed to complement this with a "SPARQL-IDE", which allows people to experiment with queries and immediately see the results, is described here: http://zbw.eu/labs/en/blog/publishing-sparql-queries-live The approach is used extensively in the skos-history project (https://github.com/jneubert/skos-history). Cheers, Joachim > -----Original Message----- > From: Niklas Petersen [mailto:petersen@cs.uni-bonn.de] > Sent: Sunday, April 26, 2015 1:01 PM > To: semantic-web@w3.org; public-lod@w3.org > Subject: Best practices on how to publish SPARQL queries? > > Hi all, > > I am currently developing a vocabulary which has "typical" queries related > to it. I am wondering if there exist any "best practices" to publish them > together with the vocabulary? > > The best practices on publishing Linked Data [1] only focuses on the > endpoints, but not on the queries. > > Has anyone else been in that situation? > > > Best regards, > Niklas Petersen > > [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/ld-bp/#MACHINE > > -- > Niklas Petersen, > Organized Knowledge Group @Fraunhofer IAIS, Enterprise Information > Systems Group @University of Bonn.
Received on Sunday, 26 April 2015 20:14:49 UTC