- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2014 15:51:49 -0400
- To: public-lod@w3.org
- Message-ID: <542C5B55.6010502@openlinksw.com>
On 10/1/14 2:42 PM, Sarven Capadisli wrote: > can't use them along with schema.org. > > I favour plain HTML+CSS+RDFa to get things going e.g.: > > https://github.com/csarven/linked-research What about: HTML+CSS+(RDFa | Microdata | JSON-LD | TURTLE) ? Basically, we have to get to: HTML+CSS+(Any RDF Notation) . The above is possible because we now have standardization of <link/>, <script/> etc.. in HTML that makes this possible. I wouldn't single out RDFa in this quest. History has shown that whenever we single anything out anything, at the notation level, we inevitably open up a new format centric war. These wars simply protract all the confusion that swirls around RDF :) -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Founder & CEO OpenLink Software Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Personal Weblog 1: http://kidehen.blogspot.com Personal Weblog 2: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter Profile: https://twitter.com/kidehen Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/+KingsleyIdehen/about LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen Personal WebID: http://kingsley.idehen.net/dataspace/person/kidehen#this
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Received on Wednesday, 1 October 2014 19:52:16 UTC