RE: Bio2RDF vs Linked Life Data

Yes, in fact, I have been using a dump from that site for most of my preliminary work. But there is no working SPARQL endpoint, and there is often a big gap between dumps. Plus, there are other datasets I want to use as well.  I am trying to understand the benefits of using these platforms that bring everything together. 

Bonnie MacKellar
mackellb@stjohns.edu


-----Original Message-----
From: Luca Matteis [mailto:lmatteis@gmail.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2014 5:24 PM
To: Bonnie MacKellar
Cc: public-lod@w3 org (public-lod@w3.org)
Subject: Re: Bio2RDF vs Linked Life Data

Have you looked at this: http://linkedct.org/ ?
There seem to be lots of different URIs for the same resource define by Bio2RDF, LLD and LinkedCT so I'd choose the provider with most up-to-date results.

On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 10:50 PM, Bonnie MacKellar <mackellb@stjohns.edu> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I notice that several datasets I am interested in appear both on the 
> Bio2RDF and Linked Life Data platforms.  I want to integrate some of 
> the data contained in these data sets for an application. Is there an 
> advantage to using one platform over the other? Do they both provide 
> dumps of the triples? Are they up to date (for example, both contain 
> clinical trial data, which should be up to date to be useful).?  I 
> have spent some amount of time searching for written comparisons and 
> am coming up with nothing. Sorry if this is an elementary question, but I am just digging into this right now.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Bonnie MacKellar
>
> mackellb@stjohns.edu
>
>

Received on Tuesday, 17 June 2014 21:28:23 UTC