- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 15:10:09 -0500
- To: public-lod@w3.org
- Message-ID: <52EAB1A1.3070805@openlinksw.com>
On 1/30/14 1:09 PM, Melvin Carvalho wrote: > > > If not bad, is there any provision for allowing that an HTTPS URI > that only differs in the scheme part from HTTPS URI be identified > as the same resource? > > > http and https are fundamentally different resources, but you can link > them together with owl : sameAs, I think ... Yes. You simply use an <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#sameAs> relation to indicate that a common entity is denoted [1] by the http: and https: scheme URIs in question. [1] http://bit.ly/1fqJ5yv -- Denotes Relation [2] http://bit.ly/Lf4TSg -- Referent [3] http://bit.ly/1bD2eZs -- Identifier. -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Founder & CEO OpenLink Software Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter Profile: https://twitter.com/kidehen Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/+KingsleyIdehen/about LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Received on Thursday, 30 January 2014 20:10:40 UTC