- From: Ruben Verborgh <ruben.verborgh@ugent.be>
- Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2013 15:38:07 +0000
- To: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>
- Cc: public-lod@w3.org
Hi Phil, Thanks for the pointer. POWDER is definitely interesting and relevant, but I’m a bit hesitant to apply regexing. In general, I’m quite a fan of opaque URLs; that is, let the server maintain full control. While HTML GET forms are a level-breaker in that regard, I like the strictness about them: there’s only one way to get from the form to a URL, and the server is still in control because it created the form. What are your thoughts about this? Best, Ruben On 20 Nov 2013, at 11:37, Phil Archer <phila@w3.org> wrote: > I'm interested in the answers you get to the first and last of your questions but the middle one I can do. The under used POWDER Recommendation allows you to make statements about resources based on URI patterns (with due semantic integrity [1]) - which may or may not be useful to you. See http://www.w3.org/TR/powder-grouping/ > > HTH > > Phil. > > [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/powder-formal/
Received on Wednesday, 20 November 2013 15:38:41 UTC