Re: 返: Proof: Linked Data does not require RDF

On 6/19/13 8:49 AM, Barry Norton wrote:
> On 19/06/2013 13:40, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
>> [...] That's the complete opposite of a bottom-up narrative about 
>> RDF/XML, RDFa, Turtle, JSON-LD etc.
>
> I couldn't agree more. I do a lot of training on Linked Data, and many 
> audiences I'm faced with are old-school DBAs and architects. I'm no 
> stranger to there being different possible narratives and I don't 
> denigrate your EAV spiel in this role.
>
> All the same, that this list needs to come to philosophical consensus 
> to develop new didactics is something I am very worried about (I 
> firmly believe that long philosophical threads lose subscribers).
>
>>
>>> Barry wrote:
>>>
>>> [...] I don't think we're being sensitive to what the 1000+ 
>>> subscribers of this list are mainly looking for
>>
>> I don't think any of us speak for 1000+ individuals. I think that's 
>> inherently contradictory :-)
>
> Nor do I. Hence "think". I'd intend not to speak for, but to survey...

Such a survey would be very useful :-)

Kingsley
>
> Barry
>
>


-- 

Regards,

Kingsley Idehen 
Founder & CEO
OpenLink Software
Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen
Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about
LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen