W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-lod@w3.org > February 2013

Re: annotations and RDF

From: Paul Groth <pgroth@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2013 21:36:26 +0100
Message-ID: <CAJCyKRry7LiODAwyRMMEOS8C1WLUKDXkMK+5G2VF4bZ0uAh24A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Matteo Casu <mattecasu@gmail.com>
Cc: public-lod@w3.org, semantic-web@w3.org
Hi Matteo,

Something also to look at is the Open Annotation spec [1], which is being
produced out of the combination of the Annotation Ontology and Open
Annotation Model. It seems like there's a lot of community support around
it.

Paul

[1] http://www.openannotation.org/spec/core/


On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 10:55 AM, Matteo Casu <mattecasu@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi everybody,
>
> [my apologies for cross posting -- possibly of interest for both
> communities]
>
> does anybody could point me to the major pros and cons in using the
> Annotation Ontology [0] [1] vs. the NLP interchange format in the context
> of annotating (portions of) literary texts? My impression is that when
> someone is using UIMA, the integration of AO with Clerezza-UIMA could give
> more comfort wrt NiF.
>
> [0] http://code.google.com/p/annotation-ontology/
> [1] http://www.annotationframework.org/
> [2] http://nlp2rdf.org/about
>
>
Received on Monday, 4 February 2013 20:36:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Sunday, 31 March 2013 14:24:46 UTC