W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-lod@w3.org > February 2013

Re: Linked Data & RDFa

From: François-Paul Servant <francois-paul.servant@noos.fr>
Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2013 00:45:20 +0100
Cc: public-lod <public-lod@w3.org>
Message-Id: <4C1C9C30-ECDC-4674-863F-D76468EF1C38@noos.fr>
To: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>

> Are you finding
> it hard to generate RDFa from triple datasets because it's 'supposed'
> to be intermingled with human text?

In large organizations, there are on one side teams in charge of defining the GUI, creating the HTML pages, etc, and on the other side other teams in charge of the data, API, etc. Typically the former use the API provided by the latter:  "separation of concerns", and of skills.
RDFa requires from people in charge of web pages some knowledge and understanding that are somehow related to the world of data - which is not their world. While people in charge of data are in their domain when they produce RDF/XML or turtle.



Le 18 janv. 2013 à 11:23, Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org> a écrit :

> With RDFa maturing (RDFa 1.1, particularly Lite), I wanted to ask here
> about attitudes to RDFa.
> I have acquired the impression somehow that in the Linked Data scene,
> people lean more towards the classic 'a doc for the humans, another
> for the machines' partitioning model. Perhaps this is just a
> consequence of history; digging around some old rdfweb/foaf
> discussions[1] I realise just how far we've come. RDFa wasn't an
> option for a long time; but it is now.
> So - questions. How much of the linked data cloud is expressed in some
> variant HTML+RDFa alongside RDF/XML, Turtle etc.? When/if you do so,
> are you holding some data back and keeping it only in the
> machine-oriented dumps, or including it in the RDFa? Are you finding
> it hard to generate RDFa from triple datasets because it's 'supposed'
> to be intermingled with human text? What identifiers (if any) are you
> assigning to real-world entities? Dataset maintainers ... as you look
> to the future is RDFa in your planning? Did/does Microdata confuse the
> picture?
> I'm curious where we are with this...
> Dan
> [1] http://lists.foaf-project.org/pipermail/foaf-dev/2000-September/004222.html
> http://web.archive.org/web/20011123075822/http://rdfwebring.org/2000/09/rdfweblog/example.html
Received on Friday, 1 February 2013 23:45:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:16:29 UTC