Re: Is the same video but in different encodings the owl:sameAs?

Hi all

Reading the thread, I was also thinking about a FRBR-ish approach.
Maybe you will not use the exact FRBR classes, but the spirit of it
See
http://bvatant.blogspot.fr/2013/07/frbr-and-beyond-its-abstraction-all-way.html


2013/12/5 Damian Steer <d.steer@bris.ac.uk>

>
> On 5 Dec 2013, at 13:52, Thomas Steiner <tomac@google.com> wrote:
>
> > Dear Public-LOD,
> >
> > Thank you all for your very helpful replies. Following your joint
> > arguments, owl:sameAs is _not_ an option then.
>
> You could use dc:hasFormat to link them:
>
> "A related resource that is substantially the same as the pre-existing
> described resource, but in another format." [1]
>
> <http://ex.org/video.mp4> dc:hasFormat <http://ex.org/video.ogv> .
>
> <snip>
>
> > The most reasonable
> > thing to do seems to introduce some sort of proxy object, on top of
> > which statements can be made.
>
> I prefer this. It feels FRBR-ish [2][3] although that's not quite right.
> (Are the individual videos items, and the proxy object a manifestation?)
>
> Damian
>
> [1] <http://dublincore.org/documents/dcmi-terms/#terms-hasFormat>
> [2] <
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Functional_Requirements_for_Bibliographic_Records
> >
> [3] <http://vocab.org/frbr/core.html>
>



-- 

*Bernard Vatant*
Vocabularies & Data Engineering
Tel :  + 33 (0)9 71 48 84 59
Skype : bernard.vatant
http://google.com/+BernardVatant
--------------------------------------------------------
*Mondeca*
3 cité Nollez 75018 Paris, France
www.mondeca.com
Follow us on Twitter : @mondecanews <http://twitter.com/#%21/mondecanews>
----------------------------------------------------------