- From: Thomas Steiner <tomac@google.com>
- Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2013 18:24:49 +0100
- To: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Cc: "public-lod@w3.org" <public-lod@w3.org>
Hi again, Thanks for your reply, Kingsley. > <http://ex.org/video.mp4> denotes one entity. > <http://ex.org/video.ogv> denotes another. We agree on that. I guess my question boils down to "how to avoid having to make duplicate statements about each resource"? I cannot take your proposed <#CapturedEventNameX> as a "proxy" entity, as it is not a video, but an event. My argument was more: take any random user and let them view the .ogv and the .mp4 versions of the video, and if they say it is the same (which random users most probably will do, as the visual and the audial contents are the same), the two versions can be considered owl:sameAs. One version may, e.g., have more details (say, due to the bit rate) than the other, just like the two entities below are considered owl:sameAs, even if one _may_ have more, or more accurate, facts than the other… <http://dbpedia.org/resource/London> owl:sameAs <http://rdf.freebase.com/ns/en.london> Does that make sense? Thanks, Tom -- Thomas Steiner, Employee, Google Inc. http://blog.tomayac.com, http://twitter.com/tomayac -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iFy0uwAntT0bE3xtRa5AfeCheCkthAtTh3reSabiGbl0ck0fjumBl3DCharaCTersAttH3b0ttom.hTtP5://xKcd.c0m/1181/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Wednesday, 4 December 2013 17:25:37 UTC